In other words, it looks a lot like controlled opposition to me. They give a convincing story, showing some top level evidence that leaves out about 99% of the rest of the evidence. AKA this is a contextual lie (a whole bunch of them in this case).
It's an analysis of the symbolism that could be witnessed in the " The Lost Symbol", in which Dan Brown borrows a ton of freemason's symbols present in DC in order to drive a mistery thriller. Worth a read for passtime, but the info, like "The Da Vinci Code", is imprecise and at best just surface knowledge of the stuff. Don't take it for the real deal.
This reminds me of "Fiery but mostly peaceful."
In other words, it looks a lot like controlled opposition to me. They give a convincing story, showing some top level evidence that leaves out about 99% of the rest of the evidence. AKA this is a contextual lie (a whole bunch of them in this case).
It's an analysis of the symbolism that could be witnessed in the " The Lost Symbol", in which Dan Brown borrows a ton of freemason's symbols present in DC in order to drive a mistery thriller. Worth a read for passtime, but the info, like "The Da Vinci Code", is imprecise and at best just surface knowledge of the stuff. Don't take it for the real deal.