The only difference between Maritime law and land law is the approach to what can and cannot be done.
To help little stupid people to understand their RIGHTS = EQUITY, the bill of rights was designed because two reasons:
people will simply forget their rights while following their interests.
Governments are prone to rights abuses.
Under Maritime, such government would have been out on its ass a long time. Why? Equity.
Listen carefully to Peter Strzok' s testimony in the House. What does he say to decline to answer? EQUITY?
There you have it. Under maritime everything is a contract + timelines. No contract? Then no forced performance. No disclosure? No contract, etc. No consideration? No contract. No contract, yet damaged? Impound, sue, recuperate.
The thing is, you have to think of everything. Consider the scene in Pirates of the Caribbean; Ms Swann on board the Black Pearl negotiating for the survival of Port Royal. She forgot to take herself into consideration. Note also Barbosa is specifically asking her. Hence, she was much to unaware.
Most people are toounaware to deal with this. Add a little common core and you are done for.
I know it is not a nice thin to hear/ read. It is accusatory, and ...well.....a fact. And it does not only happen in the former US. It also happens in other countries. Mostly where liberal democracies have held sway for 70 odd years or longer.
Actually, you are calling your opinion a fact. In fact, your defending the current system says to me that you have some vested interest in it continuing the way it is.
I will definitely be revisiting comments like yours within the next month to give out a dish of crow.
It is a matter of understanding what law and law systems are, and what contract actually is. Thinking there is any difference between equity and rights is not understanding contract. We all are part of a spaceship floating in the sea of space and part of one certain play: procreation, as that is what your DNA is telling you.
So, there is a divine contract.
Even social events are contractual. Pass me the salt, please? It is a request for offers. It is contractual, and it bestows an expectation on the other party and an accepted duty to positively perform. Try serving the pot with sugar instead of the required salt.
It is maritime commerce in nature. Docking of the pot, with the correct bill of lading, transport, docking, bill of lading check, agreement on correct delivery or not, acceptance of delivery, etc.
I just challenged your views. And that is the way it should be. Think it through before you piss and wind crowy wise.
NESARA is a pipedream. Won' t happen.
The only difference between Maritime law and land law is the approach to what can and cannot be done.
To help little stupid people to understand their RIGHTS = EQUITY, the bill of rights was designed because two reasons:
Under Maritime, such government would have been out on its ass a long time. Why? Equity.
Listen carefully to Peter Strzok' s testimony in the House. What does he say to decline to answer? EQUITY?
There you have it. Under maritime everything is a contract + timelines. No contract? Then no forced performance. No disclosure? No contract, etc. No consideration? No contract. No contract, yet damaged? Impound, sue, recuperate.
The thing is, you have to think of everything. Consider the scene in Pirates of the Caribbean; Ms Swann on board the Black Pearl negotiating for the survival of Port Royal. She forgot to take herself into consideration. Note also Barbosa is specifically asking her. Hence, she was much to unaware.
Most people are toounaware to deal with this. Add a little common core and you are done for.
I know it is not a nice thin to hear/ read. It is accusatory, and ...well.....a fact. And it does not only happen in the former US. It also happens in other countries. Mostly where liberal democracies have held sway for 70 odd years or longer.
Actually, you are calling your opinion a fact. In fact, your defending the current system says to me that you have some vested interest in it continuing the way it is.
I will definitely be revisiting comments like yours within the next month to give out a dish of crow.
It is a matter of understanding what law and law systems are, and what contract actually is. Thinking there is any difference between equity and rights is not understanding contract. We all are part of a spaceship floating in the sea of space and part of one certain play: procreation, as that is what your DNA is telling you.
So, there is a divine contract.
Even social events are contractual. Pass me the salt, please? It is a request for offers. It is contractual, and it bestows an expectation on the other party and an accepted duty to positively perform. Try serving the pot with sugar instead of the required salt.
It is maritime commerce in nature. Docking of the pot, with the correct bill of lading, transport, docking, bill of lading check, agreement on correct delivery or not, acceptance of delivery, etc.
I just challenged your views. And that is the way it should be. Think it through before you piss and wind crowy wise.
https://search.americaunincorporated.org/
Not some fantasy.