omits a possibility that there was another, better way.
Maybe there was. Maybe there wasn't. Q said:
4-6% lost forever.
What does this say to me? This was the lowest cost after running a million game theory scenarios that assured victory.
Second guessing "a better way" is nothing but wishful thinking based on ignorance.
Trump could have done so much more in office to stop this, and didn't.
And if he had, would that have led to the Great Awakening? There is only one goal; Freedom for all mankind.
It's not about saving a few lives. Its not about keeping everyone alive. It's not about any life. Its about all life (for all time).
He was misled, and made many puzzling choices, such as granting clemency to a Jewish terrorist instead of say, Julian Assange.
And maybe that was exactly what needed to happen to assure victory. Imagine the most complicated problem of all time. Imagine needing to get all the pieces in the right places.
Have you ever played chess? Have you ever sacrificed a piece 8 moves before that sacrifice makes sense? I have.
I am not saying don't be skeptical. I am saying don't assume you see a better way when you don't even see what the real problem is. You think a child's life is the most important thing there is. It's not even close.
For example, a common moral dilemma: Imagine a train is barreling down on a child. You can make the train change tracks, but there are a million people on the other track. Would you sacrifice a million people to save a child's life? How many would you knowingly sacrifice? Why does a child have more right to life than an adult? Are they more human?
I get it, we have built in protective instincts for children, but don't let that instinct cloud your vision of reality.
The scope of this is larger than you realize. Until you get even a glimpse of the scope of the real problem, all these "mistakes" will seem so "obvious" to you. But when you do get a glimpse of the scope, what seems like a mistake to some, seems like a solution to those that see the larger picture.
Don't assume you see the real problem. Keep doing more research. It is larger than you know.
Maybe there was. Maybe there wasn't. Q said:
What does this say to me? This was the lowest cost after running a million game theory scenarios that assured victory.
Second guessing "a better way" is nothing but wishful thinking based on ignorance.
And if he had, would that have led to the Great Awakening? There is only one goal; Freedom for all mankind.
It's not about saving a few lives. Its not about keeping everyone alive. It's not about any life. Its about all life (for all time).
And maybe that was exactly what needed to happen to assure victory. Imagine the most complicated problem of all time. Imagine needing to get all the pieces in the right places.
Have you ever played chess? Have you ever sacrificed a piece 8 moves before that sacrifice makes sense? I have.
I am not saying don't be skeptical. I am saying don't assume you see a better way when you don't even see what the real problem is. You think a child's life is the most important thing there is. It's not even close.
For example, a common moral dilemma: Imagine a train is barreling down on a child. You can make the train change tracks, but there are a million people on the other track. Would you sacrifice a million people to save a child's life? How many would you knowingly sacrifice? Why does a child have more right to life than an adult? Are they more human?
I get it, we have built in protective instincts for children, but don't let that instinct cloud your vision of reality.
The scope of this is larger than you realize. Until you get even a glimpse of the scope of the real problem, all these "mistakes" will seem so "obvious" to you. But when you do get a glimpse of the scope, what seems like a mistake to some, seems like a solution to those that see the larger picture.
Don't assume you see the real problem. Keep doing more research. It is larger than you know.