Obviously not. So how’s it help us when he does it but not when we do it? (It doesn’t?)
This whole, “Trump supporting the vaxx helps us” push reminds me of the “they’re pulling kids from the tunnels” and other such nonsense.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
I don't mind being uncomfortable and alienated. We're fighting for the freedom of the world.
I'm questioning why our leader is not doing the same. You know, since we're fighting for the freedom of the world. If his method of supporting us by supporting the enemy is more effective, shouldn't we also do the same? If it's not more effective, shouldn't Trump fall in line?
I am on the same side as he is. At least I thought I was.
So, "can I come up with your argument for you?" No.
If his hands are tied, we should be focused on untying them or finding a leader whose hands are not tied. What other compromising calls is he making with his hands tied?
That's what I'm doing. How about you? Trump is wrong, I'm not blindly following, I'm questioning and thinking for myself.
So what is the rule for which positions should take which stance on covid? For instance, if I'm just regular old anon, I should be against it, but if regular old anon gets a decent following, he should be for it? At which point do we cross over from being against it to supporting it?
I'm only asking because I want to know how best to fight the vaxx and the mandates. You're telling me Trump is taking the optimal path, so surely you can answer my question. If you can't, how do you know his path is optimal?