Obviously not. So how’s it help us when he does it but not when we do it? (It doesn’t?)
This whole, “Trump supporting the vaxx helps us” push reminds me of the “they’re pulling kids from the tunnels” and other such nonsense.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
So what is the rule for which positions should take which stance on covid? For instance, if I'm just regular old anon, I should be against it, but if regular old anon gets a decent following, he should be for it? At which point do we cross over from being against it to supporting it?
I'm only asking because I want to know how best to fight the vaxx and the mandates. You're telling me Trump is taking the optimal path, so surely you can answer my question. If you can't, how do you know his path is optimal?
I'm asking, "where is the line, on one side of which we should oppose the vaxx, and on the other side of which we most effectively oppose the vaxx by supporting it"? Since you are so ardent that this line exists, surely you could point it out? Perhaps enunciate as to why the line lies where it does?
You go on to say that the line about which I'm inquiring is drawn such that it separates those not under duress from those who are. Which is the best answer I've received so far, despite asking this same question in various forms probably 40 times across all our boards today.
But, if President Trump has a gun to his head, what other compromised decisions has he made? To me, he has looked comp'd since 1/6, when he was whisked away in a car and never appeared at the capitol like he said he would. In that case, not acting on the nov 2020 insurrection was a comp'd decision. Further, what help would electing a comp'd president's suggestions for 2022 do for us, and what of 2024?