Yeah I am pretty neutral on him, he could be garbage or he could be a good guy. But it is funny to me that (some of) the exact same people who bent themselves into a pretzel to defend him when he was attacked for some of his absolutely bat shit insane ideas, and some of them are, are now jumping on any little shred of evidence that they think, because they can’t know, that they think outs him as a bad guy to prove that he’s a bad guy.

Until the next time he does or says something that they love, then they will be back to patting him on the back again. Then will see more lines around numbers pointing to red boxes with letters and info to prove that he’s actually one of the good guys.

And, no, I’m definitely not trying to defend the guy. His incredibly implausible and statistically impossible claims about false flags, especially a few of them that were monstrously insane, did more damage to the “truth community“ than anyone else could’ve done at the time.

Plenty of people were coming around on the idea of government false flags until the claims started to get more and more outrageous and implausible. Now, most people just immediately tune somebody out as soon as they hear that phrase. I know I do. I’m not special, there are millions upon millions of people just like me who now tune out anyone who uses the phrase “false flag.“

Whereas I would’ve automatically listened to them say, 10 years ago or maybe even five years ago, I actually have to force myself to give them a chance now to hear what they have to say. The phrase itself turns my stomach because of how many idiotic, imbecilic, retarded, Mongoloid theories have been formulated using that phrase. He’s at least partially responsible for that. So believe me, I’m not defending him.