I have always been a proponent of the idea that one should not “lose sight of the forest for the trees.”
George Soros and other proponents of The Great Reset a/k/a The New World Order a/k/a One World Government have publicly and vocally made clear that President Trump is their enemy and their goal is remove him in order for their plan of world domination to take full effect. President Trump is their obstacle.
President Trump is their enemy because he supports capitalism, America First, and the will of We The People.
So to those who now claim to be against President Trump, my question is do you support George Soros and his cronies?
Are you lost in the trees of individual issues so much so that you have lost sight of the forest?
Do you choose to not believe the public statements of George Soros and his cronies? Do you want Soros, Gates, et al. to achieve massive worldwide depopulation?
The Great Reset a/k/a The New World Order a/k/a One World Government is COMMUNISM.
Choose a side. But choose wisely.
Don’t let them play you into turning against President Trump.
President Trump is the leader of We The People. We do not know his rationale for every position (a tree) but we know he stands with us for freedom (the forest).
I will continue to support President Trump even if I may disagree with him on a particular issue (a tree). He is fighting for We The People to prevent Communism from taking over our country (the forest).
Are you willing to sacrifice a few trees in order to save the forest?
Wake up, America. Don’t get lose sight of the forest for the trees.
Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸
Yeah. My guess is that the first clip was doctored to remove the plane. It's the exact same video clip with the plane removed. There is too much compression to do a proper forensic analysis, but I will say it's much easier to remove a plane from the video footage than to add it back in.
https://m.facebook.com/911MustEnd/videos/undeniable-proof-911-planes-were-cgi-inserted-into-video/872998899714621/ worth watching the other videos as well
I think someone is just fucking with the 911 conspiracy community and editing out the planes, either that or the angle of view blocks the plane behind the towers in just the right way so that you never see it. The most damning thing in that documentary is the broadcast announcement of building 7's collapse. That's always been one of the most clearly botched aspects of an otherwise well-planned attack in my view. Aside from that I'm not remotely convinced that the planes were added with CGI or holograms, there were plenty of people who saw the planes in person, and the interviews in this video have been cherry picked. In the fog of war, a plane hitting a building sounds an awful lot like an explosion, so naturally a lot of people used that word in their interviews. What are the sources for the original footage vs the tv broadcast? How could the planes be edited so quickly and flawlessly into news footage broadcast live? The video did a poor job of explaining those sources. The slow motion view of the plane used frame morphing to interpolate the frames, which introduces strange artifacts with the wing. Even if this was CGI planes, the amount of coordination required to pull this off is insane, besides the fact that holographic tech isn't advanced enough to fake the planes in real life. Maybe at night, but certainly not broad daylight. Would have been easier to just hijack the planes, in fact, actor James Woods witnessed a dry run of one of the hijackings on one of his flights. I believe the attacks were planned, and that the object hitting the Pentagon was likely a missile, but I don't think it's necessary to inject next-level ridiculous theories about fake planes hitting the towers. I'm sure you could find hundreds of people who saw the planes in person when it happened. Sorry I'm just not a believer.
Doesn't explain the sound though. How could someone remove engine sound roaring while maintaining the other background sound?
This one puzzled me a bit, but after listening to each one five times, I think I know the answer. The Facebook clip has the same audio, but it sounds like it has been compressed multiple times, and the low frequency rumble of the plane had been mostly lost. I think it's the same audio but with a slightly different EQ due to compression. If you listen on headphones you can hear the planes engine in both of them.