I have always been a proponent of the idea that one should not “lose sight of the forest for the trees.”
George Soros and other proponents of The Great Reset a/k/a The New World Order a/k/a One World Government have publicly and vocally made clear that President Trump is their enemy and their goal is remove him in order for their plan of world domination to take full effect. President Trump is their obstacle.
President Trump is their enemy because he supports capitalism, America First, and the will of We The People.
So to those who now claim to be against President Trump, my question is do you support George Soros and his cronies?
Are you lost in the trees of individual issues so much so that you have lost sight of the forest?
Do you choose to not believe the public statements of George Soros and his cronies? Do you want Soros, Gates, et al. to achieve massive worldwide depopulation?
The Great Reset a/k/a The New World Order a/k/a One World Government is COMMUNISM.
Choose a side. But choose wisely.
Don’t let them play you into turning against President Trump.
President Trump is the leader of We The People. We do not know his rationale for every position (a tree) but we know he stands with us for freedom (the forest).
I will continue to support President Trump even if I may disagree with him on a particular issue (a tree). He is fighting for We The People to prevent Communism from taking over our country (the forest).
Are you willing to sacrifice a few trees in order to save the forest?
Wake up, America. Don’t get lose sight of the forest for the trees.
Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸
The first plane, sure, but after that first hit people scrambled to set up their cameras in their apartments and get a better view. Lots of home videos caught the second plane. No way those are all fake. Also there is a difference between a holographic plane and a plane that was added in later with CGI. Sometimes it's unclear which theory is being promoted.
would you mind pointing me to where I can watch some of these amateur home videos of the plane approaching or crashing? ;) its a trick question of course but I do wish you luck in finding these videos for me. the most famous one, and probably the one you are remembering is this:
https://www.military.com/video/operations-and-strategy/terrorism/rare-new-footage-of-9-11-wtc-attack/1785368803001
watch it again knowing what you know now. tell me if anything seems suspect to you. as for hologram vs cgi- the TV footage is confirmed CGI (at least in my opinion). Its been broken down pretty well and duplicated by special effects artists.
I was specifically thinking of Chris Hopewell's video around 2:30, but the entire video has a lot of good ones. Cell phone cameras weren't as prevalent back then but the fact that so many angles of the second impact exist and they all line up well with each other tells me it's legit.
As for the video you sent, I've seen it before and it really doesn't add much. The second impact happens off camera and by the time the photographer readjusts the camera it was too late to see the plane.
I dont really want to debate the legitimacy of specific videos. There is no need to because you can observe the planes defying the laws of physics. Explain how that is occurring if the crashes were real. Can an aluminum balloon penetrate a steel/concrete wall without deceleration or debris? For every action equal opposite reaction. Imagine the plane was stationary and you hit it with the tower at 560mph. What would happen? What would you see? Nvm the fact that a plane cannot fly at that altitude at that speed. Use your brain. Things clearly dont add up here.
And you think a hologram makes more sense? You don't know that the crash defies the laws of physics because you have very few incidents to compare it to. I have no problem believing a fast descending plane could penetrate a high rise building. Sure the aluminum isn't as strong as other metals but you've still got literal tons of it, in addition to the weight of the passengers and luggage. Take all that weight and apply it to a small area of the building. We aren't talking about a concrete wall here, mostly sheetrock and the outer steel columns.