Duck Duck Go provides the most slanted curation on this. My search terms were "Unvaccinated deaths." The primary source is the CDC.
Some questions we need answered for this research:
What date parameters are used for determining the death tally? Does it include dates from before vaccines were available?
How are the "unvaccinated" determined? Do those with two shots count? Or those who got jabbed within two weeks prior to death?
Sources will be necessary. I'm currently in a group email debate with friends about the vaccine. I can prove the mRNA drugs are killing people, but I also need to prove there's little to no efficacy. Pro vax claims like "99% of deaths were unvaccinated " sounds a lot like "99% of voters voted for candidate X," meaning these stats are impossible and likely fraudulent.
Just remember, figures don't like,
but liars do figure.
Data manipulation is how they lie to the sheep.
If they don't like the data, and they can't manipulate it enough, then they change the definition of words. For instance, a person is no longer considered vaccinated if he hasn't the proper number of boosters.
Duck Duck Go provides the most slanted curation on this. My search terms were "Unvaccinated deaths." The primary source is the CDC.
Some questions we need answered for this research:
What date parameters are used for determining the death tally? Does it include dates from before vaccines were available?
How are the "unvaccinated" determined? Do those with two shots count? Or those who got jabbed within two weeks prior to death?
Sources will be necessary. I'm currently in a group email debate with friends about the vaccine. I can prove the mRNA drugs are killing people, but I also need to prove there's little to no efficacy. Pro vax claims like "99% of deaths were unvaccinated " sounds a lot like "99% of voters voted for candidate X," meaning these stats are impossible and likely fraudulent.
I used the weekly ONS figures in the UK to show a trend that vaccinated in every age group were dying at a rate of +1% per week.
I stopped working the data a couple of months ago because it was just too scary.
tldr; even with fudged figures you can track trends which can elicit real data.
Just remember, figures don't like, but liars do figure.
Data manipulation is how they lie to the sheep. If they don't like the data, and they can't manipulate it enough, then they change the definition of words. For instance, a person is no longer considered vaccinated if he hasn't the proper number of boosters.
quite, which is why it's useful to track trends, because week to week they were using the same benchmarks.