Was just validating this myself. When someone says "covid", let's all pretend they mean any coronavirus disease and not just COVID-19, because that's what the word should mean. And do you know the full scientific name of all human coronavirus diseases two years ago?

COLD.

We've known about coronavirus diseases for almost 100 years, we've now found 7 different human-affecting coronaviruses out of about 40, and besides the two deadlier ones (SARS and MERS viruses) the other five all have cold symptoms. So, based on the other four virus names, we should start saying there are five common covids: COVID-19, COVID-229E, COVID-NL63, COVID-HKU1, or COVID-OC43. (To be accurate, these are not official disease names; the virus names are HCoV- plus the suffix, and the official disease name is (common) cold. I'm going to start saying that other phrase more, "common covid".)

If you have cold symptoms pick your favorite coronavirus of the other four and tell people you have that virus instead SARS-CoV-2. That allows you to explain that what you really have is the cold, and that the symptoms of all five viruses are identical but only one is genetically sequenced to death and the other four are never worried about, so interchangeable. That allows you to explain that all doctors long ago (about the 60s) agreed that no vaccine can eradicate these 4 coronaviruses and that the viruses are permitted to circulate freely because all they cause is colds. May SARS-CoV-2 have the same fate.

There is no difference between "COVID-19" and "cold" diagnosis except genetics, which for 100 years of coronavirus research was regarded as totally irrelevant to diagnosis, because it is. Ron Paul was almost the first to say it, about May of last year: "All this for a cold virus!"