Depopulation and Control Tool: 5G
5G tower burning (different locations): https://www.bitchute.com/video/16nI0XmWMCqw/
5G tower burning down in India: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XwcKoeaIurOO/
The Dangers Of 5G - 5/30/2018 5G Radiation Dangers
Thousands of studies link low-level wireless radio frequency radiation exposures to a long list of adverse biological effects, including:
-DNA single and double strand breaks
-oxidative damage
-disruption of cell metabolism
-increased blood brain barrier permeability
-melatonin reduction
-disruption to brain glucose metabolism
-generation of stress proteins
-Let’s not also forget that in 2011 the World Health Organization (WHO) classified radio frequency radiation as a possible 2B carcinogen.
-More recently the $25 million National Toxicology Program concluded that radio frequency radiation of the type currently used by cell phones can cause cancer.
#1 – A DENSER SOUP OF ELECTROSMOG We’re going to be bombarded by really high frequencies at low, short-range intensities creating a yet denser soup of electrosmog.
#2 – EFFECTS ON THE SKIN So we’re looking at possibilities of many skin diseases and cancer as well as physical pain to our skin.
#3 – EFFECTS ON THE EYES A 1994 study found that low level millimeter microwave radiation produced lens opacity in rats, which is linked to the production of cataracts.
#4 – EFFECTS ON THE HEART A 1992 Russian study found that frequencies in the range 53-78GHz (that which 5G proposes to use) led to heart arrhythmias and variabilites.
#7 – EFFECTS ON BACTERIA RESISTANCE The concern is that we develop a lower resistance to bacteria as our cells become more vulnerable – and we become more vulnerable.
#8 – EFFECTS ON PLANT HEALTH One of the features of 5G is that the MMW is particularly susceptible to being absorbed by plants and rain. Another Armenian study found that MMWs of low intensity “invoke(s) peroxidase isoenzyme spectrum changes of wheat shoots.” Peroxidase is a stress protein existing in plants. Indications are that 5G will be particularly harmful to plants – perhaps more so than to humans.
#9 – EFFECTS ON THE ATMOSPHERE AND DEPLETION OF FOSSIL FUELS Implementation of the 5G global wireless network requires the launching of rockets to deploy satellites for 5G. These satellites have a short lifespan which would require a lot more deployment than what we’re currently seeing. A new type of hydrocarbon rocket engine expected to power a fleet of suborbital rockets would emit black carbon which “could cause potentially significant changes in the global atmospheric circulation and distributions of ozone and temperature”
#10 – DISRUPTION OF THE NATURAL ECOSYSTEM Since the year 2000, there have been reports of birds abandoning their nests as well as health issues like “plumage deterioration, locomotion problems, reduced survivorship and death."
The declining bee population is also said to be linked to this non-ionizing EMF radiation. It reduces the egg-laying abilities of the queen leading to a decline in colony strength. https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1053072081009/5G%20Radiation%20Dangers%20-%2011%20Reasons%20To%20Be%20Concerned%20_%20ElectricSense.pdf
Wouldn't it be a shame if all these 5G Towers start falling down or bursting into flames? 😎 🔥🔥
People need to learn the difference between 5G, and RF frequencies, wavelegth, and RF energy.
5G is a digital encoding specification. Just like 4G was. And 3G. Etc.
Are you saying 3g,4g,5g really isn't bad?
Most people don't understand what a digital communication standard is. The old analog phones broadcast a high power signal to a tower. Not much different than yelling at the neighbors from across the yard. Cell phones use digital transmission rather than analog. Actually, that's a misnomer, as there is still an analog signal, but the transmit power is much less than the old analog phones used. Voice and data is transmitted on the analog signal via digital encoding (using the G standards). So the 3G, 4G, LTE labels are a way of describing the digital encoding standard being used. There's a lot of marketing associated with that.
Also, cell phones don't transmit continuously, as that uses a lot of power. Unless you are sending a large amount of data, like pictures, then the phone transmits until the data has been sent. Voice isn't a lot of data density, so the phone sends the data in small bursts, or packets, then goes silent for a short time while another phone transmits on the same channel. I'm not sure how many phones a single channel can support with voice transmissions though. Voice data rate is low compared to almost anything else, but there's overhead in managing multiple phones on a single channel.
The thing that people get excited about when it comes to 5G is that the it has been associated with opening up new transmission frequencies (or spectrum). Some of those frequencies are in fairly high ranges, and some of them are associated with specific frequencies that are preferentially absorbed by various molecules, like oxygen. Is that bad? Hard to say.
A microwave oven works by concentrating a lot of RF (radio frequency) energy into a small area. Typically 1000 Watts. A cell phone typically transmits at less than 1 Watt. And cell phone power isn't concentrated, it radiates out from an antenna, so the actual RF power drops off with the square of the distance (there are things that affect that, but phased array antennas are not typically found in a cell phone, and if they were, the signal energy would be transmitted away from the body to get the best signal reception). So if you use the speaker and set the phone a couple feet away, the RF energy absorbed by your body is substantially reduced.
Finally, a note about ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation is bad. That's the stuff that changes DNA, makes things radioactive, etc. Ionizing radiation is a function of wavelength or frequency. The wavelength needs to be close to the size of the molecules affected. Typical cell phone wavelengths are 2inches (50mm) to about 20 inches (500mm). Ionizing radiation wavelengths start in the UV light spectrum, at around 370nm. Roughly 1 million times shorter. We know UV causes cancer, but it doesn't make stuff radioactive, because it doesn't interact with matter on the atomic level. Wavelengths need to be roughly 10,000 time shorter for that to occur.
3G, 4G, 5G all dangerous to your health and the environment.
3G: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-198250/3G-mobile-masts-health-risk.html
4G: https://www.rfsafe.com/study-shows-30-mins-exposure-4g-lte-cell-phone-radiation-alters-brain-activity/
I always thought this was a weird rabbit hole. Didn't we learn there isn't really such a 'thing' has 3g/4g etc? Like there wasn't any uniform specification and just became marketing buzzwords? This is why T-mobile rolled out 4G, called out on their fake 4G, and later it became 4G LTE?
I think it was T-Mobile displayed HSPA and UMTS as 4g on the indicator bar on people's phones when really it is 3G technology. LTE and WiMax (Sprint's failed 4g) are the only true 4g technologies as far as I know. 5g that uses NR (new radio) is true 5g but 5GE from AT&T is actually LTE.
I've never kept up with the various carriers interpretation of the Telecom standards. I do know they all use marketing to pretend they are on the cutting edge of the technology while they slowly implement updated technologies to relieve channel congestion. It's a cost benefit thing - increase the customer base by putting up another tower, or upgrading the transcoding hardware. If they don't do something, they start losing customers.
I think Chugga got most of it as far as the carriers go. Telecommunication specifications / standards and implementation are never really the same thing. Which is true of a lot of standards. No one wants to advertise "we're 2 generations behind the competition", so what any of them mean by this G or that G varies by carrier.
The point I was trying to make is that the 5G specification (or really, the communications specification that people brand as 5G) is an encoding specification with the ability to transfer a lot more data in the same bandwidth. So you can implement 5G on any existing channel, and exotic frequencies are not required. That is also the reason why 2G and 3G is being phased out. Those standards use a lot of spectrum compared to the amount of data transfer. Removing those increases the amount of data each channel can support, and increases the efficiency of each channel.