Remember; her indictment/arrest & trial was from a period in the 1990s. Will the sentencing fit the crimes from this 1990s period?
How many victims thereafter have criminal claims against her? And will there be other crimes she will be held accountable for? Will other victims come forward? Maxwell's crimes extended a period of 30 years!
Obviously, this woman has NO moral compass and that is why she was NOT out on bail. She has been a danger to society and therefore her bail was revoked.
If the judge merely slaps her on the wrist with 'light' sentencing for her crimes from that period in time we will know the system is rigged by a biased judge.
Recall; this judge went up to Congress for her appointment hearing to a higher judgeship position DURING this Maxwell trial. If this judge's position is to go 'lightly' on Maxwell's crimes/sentencing it will send a clear & concise message to Congress and will therefore jeopardize her chances of this judge's next rung up the ladder to a higher judgeship position! Will she do what the law requires and sentence Maxwell according to the crimes she has been found guilty of?
Let us see what this judge's sentencing ruling dictates.
Public corruption unit is to public corruption like "Save the children" is to vulnerable children.
That may be, but if the focus of the investigation was Epstein and Maxwell, then why would that department be involved in the investigation at all?
Reliable coverup artists to sweep the IC connection under the rug.
If this is just going to be swept under the rug, then why is the public corruption unit investigating non-public figures?