Prince Andrews lawyers locked in emergency talks
(www.mirror.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (113)
sorted by:
I'm afraid it's you who are wrong.
First, here's Biden's salute:
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/national-international/presidential-salute-battery-marks-bidens-inauguration-with-21-gun-salute/2500288/
And here's Trump's:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN1zIJc8PUU
Yes, I agree, there are three for Biden and four for Trump. So what's the manual say?
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN20654_R600_25_Admin_FINAL.pdf
The table showing what kind of cannon salute various offices receive can be found straddling pages 4 and 5.
You'll note that the only office that receives salute with 3 cannons is "American envoys, American ambassadors having returned to the United States but not on official business, or ministers and foreign envoys, or minis- ters accredited in the United States" and "Lieutenant generals, vice admirals."
So, since you say "that's not something the army fucks up," you are telling me that the army saluted Biden as one of these offices, and not as president?
You might also point out that Trump's interval was 3 seconds, and Biden's was 4. However, the manual which you referred me to says, at para 3-3(a)(1)(c), "When such interval is not feasible considering condition of ammunition and materiel, number of guns available, proficiency of gun crews, atmospheric conditions, and other local limitations." So, basically, the interval is up to the officer in charge of delivering the salute, and in addition, the number of guns used in the salute can vary depending on how many are available.
Further, the table showing the particulars of each kind of salute doesn't differentiate between 3 and 4 second intervals. The fact that the interval was different doesn't make it a different salute.
I've outlined my reasoning and cited the document you told me to look up. Could you show me where in that manual, or where in any other official document, that it says the salute Biden received was not a presidential salute?
I'm aware of the filming discrepancies in Biden's inauguration, including the cloudy skies one minute and sun the next, and people moving around between supposedly contemporaneous cuts.
Nevertheless, you alleged the salute Biden was given was not a presidential salute. I referred you to the manual you tell me you've read, I quoted the relevant parts, showing you that the salute he received WAS a presidential salute, and further, the salute he received couldn't be interpreted as having been for any other position. It was a presidential salute. If you disagree, I invite you to read the manual you told me to read, because it's clear you haven't. I even cited it for you.
How is the fact that Biden's inauguration looked weird evidence that the US mil is on our side? If they were on our side, they'd have prevented Biden from assuming office.
I'm dismissing the discrepancies because none of those things are required for someone to become president. I'm further dismissing the gun salute thing because the very manual you told me to refer to says it was a presidential gun salute.
I agree though, there's nothing you can do for me, it seems like you're retarded or something.