One of the premises of Q is that we're too weak for the truth and thus we must be shown a movie while 80% of activity is hidden away from us Q189. Yet on numerous occasions Q mentions that truth is the only way, that we're in a battle for the truth, and has several posts such as Q4318 where he discusses this idea that the truth must be uncontrolled. Yet, says that the truth would put 99% in the hospital. Q142. Why is it that we, as a nation, should be protected from the truth at all? Honestly, what is worse that what we have already? We already know about the the mass trafficking, child abuse, torture and murder, the blackmail, treason, and so forth. These are some of the worst possible crimes imaginable. Even if we find out that the world is controlled by competing factions of extraterrestrials, where is this idea that humanity can't overcome and deal with these difficult truths coming from? Humanity is resilient.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Imagine a professor is trying to explain something to the class.
And all around the classroom are little gremlins breaking shit left and right and yelling and shouting that the professor is wrong and that everyone should listen to them.
Is it better to grin and bear the distractions, or get rid of the distractions one by one, if necessary, so the lesson the professor is trying to explain gets through to everyone clearly?
Simply put, if the gremlins aren't dealt with before the lesson is given, then many students will have missed out on the lesson.
It isn't a matter of if the students can hear the professor, I'm sure many if not all can, it matters whether or not they can understand the professor unabated by the onslaught of little shit gremlins all over the place.
Then, consider, what if 80% of the gremlins were disguised as students?
That's where we are right now.