Paul McCartney had a shorter/wider, much more 'heart-shaped' face. His eyes were also different, less protruding.
Faul ('man, you let your face grow long') has a much more vertical, long face, with a sizable long squarish chin + more notably round, protruding (though deep-set) 'sanpaku' 'doe eyes'. Faul was also taller, towering over Paul's then girlfriend Jane Asher vs. real Paul walking hand in hand with her, both of similar heights.
However, NOTE: VIRTUALLY ALL PHOTOS NOW ONLINE and in reprinted media of pre-1966 Beatles, have been SYSTEMATICALLY DIGITIZED, to substitute Faul for Paul. Some try to 'blend' their features together, like a hybrid.
So newer researchers have very little to compare with, as the DS has tried to erase the real Paul's image from history to cover their (despicable) attempt at deceiving humanity.
VIDEOS of the early Beatles have now virtually all been deep-faked. In some, if you look closely, you can see Paul's features morphing back and forth with Faul's in places.
It is possible Faul has been voluntarily MK'd (?), to mostly/convincingly 'believe' that he is Paul. (Rayelan Allan at Rumor Mill News once described how her husband Gunther Russbacher had to agree to it, to take part in sensitive covert missions - flying Bush Sr., etc.) 'Taking one for the team', as it were.
But most telling of all - after 1966, THE MUSIC CHANGED radically.
Early Beatles music (John + Paul synergy) vibrationally 'calibrates' at a high, joyous and uplifting level, that is actually good for the body. Seemingly simple music, yet undeniably powerful and electrifying to their audiences.
Their post-1966 music is so different in every way. And also highly overproduced, to disguise the absence of the irreplaceable genius of the Lennon/McCartney collaboration* that formed the heart of the original Beatles.
Paul McCartney had a shorter/wider, much more 'heart-shaped' face. His eyes were also different, less protruding.
Faul ('man, you let your face grow long') has a much more vertical, long face, with a sizable long squarish chin + more notably round, protruding (though deep-set) 'sanpaku' 'doe eyes'. Faul was also taller, towering over Paul's then girlfriend Jane Asher vs. real Paul walking hand in hand with her, both of similar heights.
However, NOTE: VIRTUALLY ALL PHOTOS NOW ONLINE and in reprinted media of pre-1966 Beatles, have been SYSTEMATICALLY DIGITIZED, to substitute Faul for Paul. Some try to 'blend' their features together, like a hybrid.
So newer researchers have very little to compare with, as the DS has tried to erase the real Paul's image from history to cover their (despicable) attempt at deceiving humanity.
VIDEOS of the early Beatles have now virtually all been deep-faked. In some, if you look closely, you can see Paul's features morphing back and forth with Faul's in places.
It is possible Faul has been voluntarily MK'd (?), to mostly/convincingly 'believe' that he is Paul. (Rayelan Allan at Rumor Mill News once described how her husband Gunther Russbacher had to agree to it, to take part in sensitive covert missions - flying Bush Sr., etc.) 'Taking one for the team', as it were.
But most telling of all - after 1966, THE MUSIC CHANGED radically.
Early Beatles music (John + Paul synergy) vibrationally 'calibrates' at a high, joyous and uplifting level, that is actually good for the body. Seemingly simple music, yet undeniably powerful and electrifying to their audiences.
Their post-1966 music is so different in every way. And also highly overproduced, to disguise the absence of the irreplaceable genius of the Lennon/McCartney collaboration* that formed the heart of the original Beatles.