An anon I met IRL sent me a really interesting theory, but is unable to post it because he's still a handshake on this forum. We are both interested to see what y'all think. The text is copied/pasted below but here is the link if you're curious.:
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vf5cEeH/ive-been-a-long-time-stalker-her/
I've been a long time stalker here but I decided to create an account to share this theory or possibly connection between CERN and Q with you all
These are just some thoughts I've had lately that might be worth unpacking... idk Here goes some things that I'm putting together, and why I'm now wondering if Q is CERN but with new leadership.
Mandela Effect is real. CERN figured out how to change the past and who knows what else back in 2012. If you don't believe me, watch this documentary: https://www.bitchute.com/video/7UeRYtIYfERr/ -- Say what you will about people misremembering things, but I know for a fact that Ed McMahon used to work for Publishers Clearing House. It's a hill that I'm willing to die on. I'm 39 and I have vivid memories of him showing up on people's doorsteps with $1MM checks in those commercials. Not to mention the fact that Golden Girls and Friends episodes confirm this. And don't be manipulated by trending Mandela Effect posts on social media. They are nothing but branding and logo changes designed to make us look foolish because anyone with two brain cells can figure companies rebrand all the freakin time.
I asked myself yesterday, "Is there any chance that CERN accomplished this feat and weren't immediately co-opted by at least one government??" I concluded the answer is no. It's not possible that world governments just let them do their thing with no oversight or control. So, who took control of CERN? Obama is a lazy ass. The guy legit left 200+ open seats for judges when he left office. He could have put his own people in those seats, but he's a lazy ass and doesn't like to work, so he left them open for Trump. Trump had them filled within weeks. My point here is that it's plausible that Obama didn't give a shit about CERN, and even if he did, he was too busy with other insignificant things like his cover photo on GQ Magazine, leaving the door wide open for someone else to take over CERN.
I have been thinking for the better part of this year that Q didn't plan any of what they have warned us about. I believe it's impossible that things are going according to plan this well. My point is there's a difference between having a plan, and being in control. I can't even have an argument with someone in my head that goes as well as Q's "predictions" for the future have gone. It seems like every other day I'm seeing a Q post that describes EXACTLY what's happening right now. It's insane. I believe that the only way Q can be this accurate is if they've already watched it in realtime (they're from the future -- or present, but controlling the past gives them control of the future).
Back when Lindell came out with the news about the packet captures, he interviewed an active duty Space Force guy (I think?)... maybe his last name was Foster? Don't take my word for it on his name... anyway Lindell asked him if Q was real. He replied with something like, "Yes, Q is a group of 600 men and women." I watched a documentary about CERN on Gaia TV a few months ago. Do you know how many scientists they said CERN was made up of? You guessed it. 600. I've seen "Future proves past" in so many Q posts. What in the world does that mean? I still don't know, but it sounds like a statement that someone who controls the future and the past would make.
Do you know how long the large hadron collider is? It’s 17 miles long. Coincidence? My theory based on all of the points above: White Hats in our government saw that our corrupt gov officials weren't paying any attention to what was going on with CERN, so they quietly took control of it themselves, used their tech to install Trump via things like having Comey bring charges against Hillary during the election, and then continue to use it to guide us into truly emptying the swamp, so to speak. The main question I have right now, though, is if they can bring Mandela back, who else can they bring back? If they can change the past, then are some of the videos and information that we're being introduced to now actually brand new even though they were filmed years or decades ago?
So many questions, and yet I have no answers. I would love to hear any feedback from you all. Thanks for reading!
PS. this is my first post and it's telling me to select an applicable tag but nothing is relevant. I'm going to select News but if that's not right, please forgive me!
My understanding was at least one of the purposes was as a reset button for reality.
The really short lay version of it is you collide two particles together and this creates a sort of quantum marker in time. At any point you want to jump reality/earth/whatever back to that point in time you collide those same two particles again. The problem for them is it was a collapsing spiral deal in that the furthest they could jump time back to was the first time this was discovered, and any subsequent jumps back could only go as far as the next time they created a quantum marker after the first one. So the first time was jumping back 50 years, then the next time it was only 40 and so forth.
Anyways, that’s one of the theories I have seen about it. 😉
Edit: to clarify it’s the cabalic forces hitting reset on reality every time humanity has been of the cusp of a massive spiritual awakening/enlightenment
If CERN were able to allow for time travel, it would be not as direct as some may believe. Much of this sort of topic is just theories without enough research nor proof to be definitive on anything but if time travel were possible then it would not work the way sci-fi movies or TV shows portray it to work.
The more likely outcome would be if a person went back in time and traveled back to the present that they would end up in a different dimension than they came from because changing the past would change the present.
There are so many theories around so how does one decide which theory is most likely to be accurate? There is the theory of living in a computer simulation. That one seems like a bit of a stretch but it's also considered if the entity people refer to as god were real then perhaps it's similiar to a computer simulation by a supreme being to study things.
Another theory could be that traveling back in time and back to the present could alter things enough to create or cause other dimensions to collide and cause what is referred to as the Mandela effect.
Many things are very much possible. A problem is that people refuse to accept that things are possible that they don't believe is possible. Because someone doesn't believe or understand. I don't believe in god as in the nonsense written by men and labeled a bible because that is man made and cannot be trusted as face value.
Is god real or is there a supremen being? The only real answer to that is that we may never know but the only facts that cannot be denied here are regarding biology. Everything we are is just created from electrical impulses within the brain. The brain is more or less like an organic computer.
If we talk about a computer simulation or anything similiar then many things could be considered deja-vu. There are countless documented instances of people remembering things that they know they never experienced, myself included. I've gone to a place before that i had never been to before but knew the place as if I had been there many times. This wasn't a matter of memory at fault because this was in a different state than I lived and I had never even been to that city or location before.
Regarding this thread though, I believe CERN is largely responsible for things related to the Mandela effect. Even if we were in a simluation, that wouldn't change anything regarding CERN because a simulation would mimic reality to the extent that no one would ever realize it were a simulation.
Facts are that there are many billions of worlds in the universe and no one knows what may or may not be out there. Far too often people are too arrogant to the point they believe us humans are the most superior thing period and that if there is a god that he too would look like us humans that we were made in his image but if there were a god then god would not be in a shape or form that we could understand.
Many things we may never know unless something changes. We can't even fully trust our own memories and anyone here on the GAW should know that much of recorded history is false and simply untrue. Enough research peels back the layers of the real history but even then some of that will not be documented and could be heavily flawed.
Interesting to discuss but without many billionaires heavily invested in the truth, we may never know because it comes down to a matter of resources which common people lack. If we were able to research information and create our own real life organizations to work on research in person with teams of people being able to conduct research and investigate then perhaps billionaires wouldn't be needed but as long as it's just online usernames on a website, the odds are against us of ever knowing.
What about going somewhere you've never been to before and knowing your way around the place as if you had been there many times before, the place being in a different state?
Sorry, not possible my friend. The brain can not recreate an experience it's never experienced. For example : you can't dream about a certain town in say Italy you've never been to or seen pictures from. You can't dream your own death.