Where did the idea that we would still be on lockdown without the depop shot originate? Was it in a Qdrop I am not aware of? If not who suggested ? It doesn't play out logically to me at second glance so Id love to know the source. I've asked this several times but never so much as a response. I need this info for talking with people I know that are abandoning the movement over Trump promotion of dangerous big pharma injections.. help
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Rockefeller institute case study 2010. On website. " Lockstep ". An epidemic study of when world governments go tyrannical and lockdown society for 10 to 12 years to supposedly wait for a vax. Case study. However, the west has indeed behaved in Lockstep.
Here is the link to the report - https://issuu.com/dueprocesstv/docs/scenario-for_the-future
Scroll over to pages 18-19 - Titled "Scenario Narratives - Lock Step".
In this scenario, the people give up their sovereignty to fight a global pandemic - the world remains locked down until 2026 (from the scenario's theoretical 2012 pandemic start date - 14 years) before people start fighting back... Here's a quote:
Awesome thx
That quote is from the end of the article. It doesn't mention lockdowns. It talks of closed borders, it talks of biometric ID. I appreciate the link but I downloaded the actual document. Here's page 1:
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain—originating from wild geese—was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers. The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post- pandemic recovery.
It says the shops were closed for months. That's not a decade lockdown.
So they def did lockstep by the book.
The scenario plays out past page 1... it makes a case for the different approaches by developed and undeveloped countries; but when you read what choices the undeveloped countries make:
It begins to sound like the same choices we (developed nations) are making in real life.... leading to:
In short - The scenario assumes we are not run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.
Yep and praises china's hermetically sealing the country
I just read through the 54pg document. It doesn't say there would be 10-12 year lockdowns and doesn't discuss vaccines in any tangible way. Did I read the wrong lockstep document off the Rockefeller website? And it was written in 2009 btw about 2012-2026 regarding a goose flu