MICROTECHNOLOGY FOUND IN PFIZER’S VAXXINE
(forbiddenknowledgetv.net)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
To be fair, La Quinta Columna were the first ones to break the vaccines having Graphene Oxide in them. I've seen this particular scientist offer protocol for detoxifying your body and all have seem to check out. I've watched many videos with him and he seems to be a true fighter for humanity. I've never seen him express that level of emotion before. There's clearly something very wrong here, and he's not the only one ringing the alarm bells now. I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss this. Maybe look into their past findings first. From my perspective, these guys are legitimate.
This logic reminds me of "I need double blind, peer reviewed studies or gtfo with hqc"
Be skeptical, but these guys are on humanity's side.
People don’t understand that tests are more expensive and higher precision research honed by the observational data studies etc and that in a clinical setting they’ll run data as they try their way through new shit and use the best data available as the research progresses. At the end of the day medicine is an art and in the beginning you have to start treating people the best way forward with what info you have. When shit shows promise deeper study is done.
People don’t understand medicine is improved witch-doctoring when you are in trial by fire.
https://corona2inspect-blogspot-com.translate.goog/?_x_tr_sl=es&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=es
You sound just like the MSM. What is your agenda?
I think his agenda is to prevent those who use this site from looking like idiots
Wrong.
Truth is always peer reviewed, even if we are the peers.
And right now this claim has nothing substantial to support it.
This lines up right with their agenda. How can you so easily dismiss this when we have a Harvard Chemist specializing in nano wires that is indicted for selling this tech to China.
I would definitely like to learn more of what these guys found but your summary dismissal for muh reasons sounds shill like.
Anyone that present evidence with claims like this in my view should start off by explaining why he/she has the expertise, and credibility to make such claims. Who is this guy. Why should be believe him. You have to know that some of our enemy are going to be pushing claims like this to make us sound like fruit cakes.
There can exist a genuine Appeal to Authority that is different from a fallacious appeal to authority.
In my view, a genuine appeal to authority. Without facts and logically valid inferences all words are just testimony. But the testimony of a person who has earned the right to speak, and can show why he has that right could in my view stand as a genuine appeal to authority. "Show me a man who has fought in wars, and I'll believe his war stories"
But appeal to authority as I see it, would tend to be more fallacious when that authority has not established his credibility, or right to make a claim.
That's all I was saying is before I put any faith in his claims, he first should tell me what genuine authority he has to make them.
The people with that kind of resume', with that kind of credibility, the highest paid and most respected physicians of our time, the people like Fauci, have a reason to lie to you - and they will lie to you.