Scientific study? I'm a retired weather forecaster with many years of experience briefing pilots. Try looking at any standard weather course material instead of just demanding proof. It makes you look lazy.
This article purports the same reasoning you give without references.
Weather course material and other scientific literature often relies on the assumption that somehow, sometime, someone did a scientific study to confirm a theory (humid jet exhaust at high altitude leaves thicker ice crystals than other contrails). I am personally not in the business these days of inherently trusting that sort of thing if it registers high on the scale of "Quick! Assign this to a conspiracy theory so people will stop talking about it." We see this with covid, global warming, and many other topics. That interference exists for a reason.
In this case, what you're saying might be 100% correct, but proponents of cloud seeding/ionization and geoengineering do not want the public to understand or pay attention to what they are doing. "Chemtrails" might be noise and completely wrong in pointing to thick, long lasting contrails. But there is certainly a signal in cloud ionization and geoengineering that is not acknowledged or addressed. Which immediately makes people think, coverup! because they call weather manipulation a lie or impossible and it obviously isn't...
Personally I lean towards your explanation being correct while recognizing the concerns folks have about ionization and geoengineering (weather manipulation).
Weather manipulation and artificial quake induction by mobile sea-based HAARP platforms is accomplished by ultra-low frequency emitters focused for high-atmospheric plasma lensing.
Perhaps I was too abrupt... I am not saying there are no chemicals being injected into the air. Cloud seeding has been done since the 60's, but it is rare now. That also does not mean the increase of the contrails is cloud seeding or chemicals. It just means that more aircraft are flying overhead. If I want to know if contrails will exist at a flight level, I look for moisture at that level. Simple, but it is works.
Yeah makes sense to me. Just trying to have a good source available for people who claim "chemtrails are not contrails" aka not caused by regular jet exhaust.
I have also heard the claim that these precede it often raining the next day. This makes sense to me given the explanation as they are more of a natural indicator that rain is likely rather than causation.
Scientific study? I'm a retired weather forecaster with many years of experience briefing pilots. Try looking at any standard weather course material instead of just demanding proof. It makes you look lazy.
Burden of proof is on the one making the claim but sure I'll bite.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-do-jets-leave-a-white/
This article purports the same reasoning you give without references.
Weather course material and other scientific literature often relies on the assumption that somehow, sometime, someone did a scientific study to confirm a theory (humid jet exhaust at high altitude leaves thicker ice crystals than other contrails). I am personally not in the business these days of inherently trusting that sort of thing if it registers high on the scale of "Quick! Assign this to a conspiracy theory so people will stop talking about it." We see this with covid, global warming, and many other topics. That interference exists for a reason.
In this case, what you're saying might be 100% correct, but proponents of cloud seeding/ionization and geoengineering do not want the public to understand or pay attention to what they are doing. "Chemtrails" might be noise and completely wrong in pointing to thick, long lasting contrails. But there is certainly a signal in cloud ionization and geoengineering that is not acknowledged or addressed. Which immediately makes people think, coverup! because they call weather manipulation a lie or impossible and it obviously isn't...
Personally I lean towards your explanation being correct while recognizing the concerns folks have about ionization and geoengineering (weather manipulation).
Survey of tornado tracks reveals ULF weather manipulation by Nexrad towers in alignment with Giza.
http://www.human-resonance.org/midwest.html
Weather manipulation and artificial quake induction by mobile sea-based HAARP platforms is accomplished by ultra-low frequency emitters focused for high-atmospheric plasma lensing.
http://www.human-resonance.org/quake_induction.html
I don't think this constitutes a study as such, but interesting nonetheless.
Perhaps I was too abrupt... I am not saying there are no chemicals being injected into the air. Cloud seeding has been done since the 60's, but it is rare now. That also does not mean the increase of the contrails is cloud seeding or chemicals. It just means that more aircraft are flying overhead. If I want to know if contrails will exist at a flight level, I look for moisture at that level. Simple, but it is works.
Yeah makes sense to me. Just trying to have a good source available for people who claim "chemtrails are not contrails" aka not caused by regular jet exhaust.
I have also heard the claim that these precede it often raining the next day. This makes sense to me given the explanation as they are more of a natural indicator that rain is likely rather than causation.