Some of you haven't read the q posts on Elon and it shows.
I WISH it said that. It's blanket.
Subsection (c) states that no state or political subdivision may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
What's the beast system? It's all commerce. The ability to buy and sell.
Even if you "trust" Republicans, Democrats will come in and use this to harass patriots.
Rogue judges are going to act regardless of this provision and the internet has survived without a federal restriction of state regulation on it.
You realize people said the exact same thing about the Patriot act right? Now we're illegally surveilled by the federal govt and no one bats an eye.
I generally agree with that but this is not federalism or reserving powers to the states.
This is refusing to allow regulation to stand or fail on its own merit.
I honestly have to ask this time if we're being played. If we hold the same standards as we did for "build back better" = 666 wouldn't that also apply to "big beautiful bill" ? I'm a Trump supporter but I don't like this at all. This is worse than the Patriot Act. I am hoping and praying this was a rogue Repub act not Trump's doing but with the Palantir actions I'm not so sure anymore.
I'm beginning to suspect that the Golden Dome is a critical element of the plan. What if we cannot release the Epstein blackmail details without risking nuclear retaliation.
"The truth would put 99% of people in the hospital."
I have a theory that Trump needs some enemies to be "political allies" so that when justice comes (including for Graham) the admin looks fair and neutral.
My alternate theory is that Graham is now "controlled" which makes him better than a wild card for the current moment in time.
/u/catsfive Why?
Do you believe all of the drop re: Elon Musk and SpaceX were false information?
Where's the source? Have not seen this anywhere.
Excellent post and research anon!!
I'm not saying the current J&J made any of these changes, just testing the tech first.
I am hoping and praying for Trump to lead the exposure. The public has to understand.
There's a reason I said "supposed" libertarians. This was not meant to bash libertarians but expose wolves.
Ben Shapiro notably.
Voice of America propaganda - https://www.voanews.com/a/covid-19-pandemic_why-some-libertarians-support-vaccine-mandates/6209163.html
The Economist - https://www.economist.com/free-exchange/2015/02/24/why-james-wilson-and-the-economist-supported-compulsory-vaccination
I'm not 100% on this so I'm asking.
A US Attorney who indicts someone under RICO has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or an injunction to temporarily seize a defendant's assets. There are a LOT of sealed indictments out there. Who would publicly admit their assets have been frozen due to a criminal investigation?
Thanks, what do you think could improve the quality? Re-reading it, it could have definitely used some editing for clarity.
I thought about a q post refresher to tie back the importance of these topics but that would take a long time.
Ironic analysis considering Grok helped me make some of these connections.
Amen. His will will be done in the end.
Wow, just noticing the income tax & corporate tax greyed out. That's new as well. That implies they are past legacy numbers if we go by the rest of the chart.
I have always wondered why the US M2 money supply from 2000 changes.
The estimated number continues to go up. This implies assets are continued to be recaptured as part of an ongoing RICO prosecution.
Re-read the drops on SpaceX and EM.
If Trump's "why are we still talking about Epstein" comment is some kind of Art of the Deal moment, he can handle the blowback.
At face value it rightfully deserves to be criticized and exposed.