I would advise you to do your own research but I'll give you a few hints.
There are three "city states" in the world that are cities that reside within countries but are sovereign states within a country.
Vatican City, a Sovereign state apart from Italy (Head of the fractionalized banking cartel world wide)
City of London, not to be confused with London, UK but a sovereign state apart from the UK, (the Rothschild banking empire, lapdogs of the Vatican)
Washington DC, a city state that is sovereign, a district of Columbia (which was one of the names being considered during the formation of the USA) also a lapdog for the Rothschild banking empire and thus controlled by the Vatican, ultimately.
Also, research the US military war guide for occupying foreign capitols and what laws they must follow when occupying foreign territory.
Not seeing how this can this be true when indigenous people on multiple continents hold sovereign lands inside states of countries and identify city states within these, among their people. Just because Randy McNally and Google won't stick a pin in it doesn't invalidate their land identifiers.
If you didn't want to share your actual sauce you could have said it.
Your true and righteous (perhaps) post is straying from the issue at hand and is a side tangent argument intended to abandone the original truth topic in order to argue ethnic sovereignty.
Individual Ethnic legal sovereignties do not have the pull these old dynasties have, they can imagine they are more powerful then they are but in the end it was scraps given to them by the old houses who actually hold the reigns of power.
My response was nothing to do with their ethnics. You're pole vaulting there from my citing there are more than 3 of what you claimed there are only 3. Size and power aren't relevant. There are more than 3 and that was the only point.
The only "abandone" here is you not providing some support evidence the capitol would relocate to Colorado.
Is it going to? Maybe! We just witnessed the area get torched so it lends credibility to the claim. But telling others go do their own research on your claim is kind of a sleazy way out by you. We do research. We're all here, there, and everywhere trying to find answers. There's always room to improve and learn more but there's only so much time and people have lives to live.
I would advise you to do your own research but I'll give you a few hints.
There are three "city states" in the world that are cities that reside within countries but are sovereign states within a country.
Vatican City, a Sovereign state apart from Italy (Head of the fractionalized banking cartel world wide)
City of London, not to be confused with London, UK but a sovereign state apart from the UK, (the Rothschild banking empire, lapdogs of the Vatican)
Washington DC, a city state that is sovereign, a district of Columbia (which was one of the names being considered during the formation of the USA) also a lapdog for the Rothschild banking empire and thus controlled by the Vatican, ultimately.
Also, research the US military war guide for occupying foreign capitols and what laws they must follow when occupying foreign territory.
Not seeing how this can this be true when indigenous people on multiple continents hold sovereign lands inside states of countries and identify city states within these, among their people. Just because Randy McNally and Google won't stick a pin in it doesn't invalidate their land identifiers.
If you didn't want to share your actual sauce you could have said it.
Your true and righteous (perhaps) post is straying from the issue at hand and is a side tangent argument intended to abandone the original truth topic in order to argue ethnic sovereignty.
Individual Ethnic legal sovereignties do not have the pull these old dynasties have, they can imagine they are more powerful then they are but in the end it was scraps given to them by the old houses who actually hold the reigns of power.
My response was nothing to do with their ethnics. You're pole vaulting there from my citing there are more than 3 of what you claimed there are only 3. Size and power aren't relevant. There are more than 3 and that was the only point.
The only "abandone" here is you not providing some support evidence the capitol would relocate to Colorado.
Is it going to? Maybe! We just witnessed the area get torched so it lends credibility to the claim. But telling others go do their own research on your claim is kind of a sleazy way out by you. We do research. We're all here, there, and everywhere trying to find answers. There's always room to improve and learn more but there's only so much time and people have lives to live.