Some people are getting upset when I ask them for real evidence that Betty White was some type of evil witch.
I don’t worship Betty White despite the fact that she was a nice old lady and a comic genius.
I’m trying to defend this community from disinformation.
Disinformation is often comes in the form of a planted discrediting campaign. A good example of that is the flat earth campaign. Somebody spent a lot of money trying to create the idea that ALL conspiracy theorists believe that the earth is flat.
If Left-wing media organizations can plant the false narrative that all of us here at dot.win believe that “Betty White is the Satanic queen of Hollywood” most people are not going to believe it, because there’s no legitimate evidence for that.
Once they’ve created the narrative that all Trump followers are delusional then the Normie’s can ignore every single legitimate piece of evidence that we present to them. It’s called poisoning the well. Once you pour just a little bit of poison into the well of dot.win then no one is going to drink anymore water from this site.
Normie thinking: “Those people believe that Betty White is a Satanist therefore when they tell me that Joe Biden is a serial sex abuser, I don’t have to pay attention to that at all.”
I thought that Betty White was an amusing comic actress. I don’t worship her. You can go through my posting history before last week and I never ever mentioned her. And there is also nothing suspicious about her that’s ever been posted about her here until after she died.
So I want you to dig really hard and give me the legitimate, legally valid evidence that Betty White was the satanic queen of Hollywood. If you don’t have any legitimate evidence shut the f-ck up.
P.S. Black eyes, off-color jokes and resemblances between old ladies are not valid legitimate, legal forms of evidence.
You first, dig really hard and give me the legitimate, legally valid evidence that the earth is not flat. The conundrum here is that none of us have access to reliable intel that allows us to draw true factual conclusions.
Then why don’t people stop pulling crap out of their asses and calling it facts.
Evidence That Betty White was the satanic queen of Hollywood:
Betty White was charming and she sometimes told dirty jokes. She got a black eye (because older people never fall down, right?) She wore panda earrings a few times. The age at which she “chose” to die was 99. She looks like another old lady who we think was very bad (Barbara Bush).
Yeah I was looking for evidence that would stand up in a court of law:
Evidence like records of who flew on who’s plane. (Epstein’s Lolita express)
Photos of person X standing next to person Y. (Lady Gaga & Marina Abramovic)
Legally valid testimony against someone of rape or sexual assault. (J. Biden & B. Clinton, Several Hollywood directors and producers)
Involvement with cults like Scientology or Nexivm. (Several people in Hollywood)
Working with charities involved with needy children or orphans. (Haiti)
Involvement with satanic abstract art or art-money laundering. (Abromovic, H. Biden)
Involvement with industries as sexualize young children including modeling or the music industry. (Epstein, Rachel Chandler, Madonna)
Many people in Hollywood and DC have evidence on them as listed above. None of this evidence exists for Betty White.
But for some reason, some people are focused on Betty White. Why is that?
It’s called poisoning the well. Some people want to make all of us here on dot.win look like idiots.
I still don't get the "court of law" standard you want to apply. Do you think there will ever be this kind of evidence for 99% of what is discussed here? By definition this stuff is all clandestine. We can only look at circumstantial coincidental stuff and come to our own conclusions about what it means.EDIT: Where is your evidence for your statement that "Betty actually continued working because she loved comedy"?
The reason that Ghislaine Maxwell will likely go to jail is because she was convicted of sexual abuse in a court of law by a jury.
Because Ms. Maxwell was convicted in a court of law of procuring teen girls for Epstein and other men, when you tell your aunt that global elites are involved in child sex trafficking she might actually believe you.
But if the first thing you tell your aunt is that one of her favorite actresses was the Satanic queen of Hollywood, I think she’s going to stop listening to you when you start talking about Epstein and Maxwell.
You would have just discredited yourself.
My evidence that Betty enjoyed working was that when I saw her on stage or on TV she did a good job and seemed to be having a good time. It didn’t seem like she had a gun to her head. It’s called common sense, let’s start using it.
Sorry, but that was kinda lame. I'm not talking to my aunt here I can promise you that. And I would never try to hit her over the head with "HRC eats babies!" kind of red pill even if I was. Finally, your "evidence" is no different than our "evidence" - its just a personal observation - a perception - from which you drew a conclusion. I might draw a different conclusion if I saw an actress "acting" like she was having a good time. Just sayin.
You sound like an engineer. If your teammates are crappy coders, do you go about telling them their coding style is crap and they shouldn't write code?
Probably not. The same thing as being in a forum full of lazy/non-critical thinkers. You don't go about calling them lazy or stupid. Instead, take action and own up to improving the quality of discussion instead of ranting and complaining. That'll only add fuel to the fire and make things worse.
A long time ago in another life, I was a computer programmer. At that time I was not good or careful about documenting my code because my boss was more concerned with the interface, etc.. I wish he had put more pressure on me to document correctly because I know that when I left that job it made the next programmer’s job more difficult.
I’m just asking people who make postings here to document their code, i.e. back up their statements with facts and evidence.
Yea. I completely agree with you here on this. There's a lot of posts that go on here that is based on a hunch -- and some are intentional malfeasance. It's easy to change someone's opinion by either posting a counterexample or questioning their line of logic.
Yeah her success couldn’t be because she was funny and she had talent, could it?
And yes in action or romance movies acting roles for older women are rare but in a movie or a comedy about a family there going to you need someone to play the crazy grandma.
Because Betty White wasn’t senile like Joe Biden, she could actually remember her lines. It’s cheaper to hire her for those grandma roles than it is to take a younger actress and put a crap ton of make up on her.
Cheaper? Probably not. She was a gold mine and a good actress who everybody loved.
More profitable? Most definitely.
I am with you here. The evidence just isn't there. A handful of coincidences in a career spanning what? 7 decades? She was in Hollywood before Hollywood was Hollywood.
How vocal was she against Trump? That to me is a huge indicator.