The PR flack wording is ambiguous - the claim by 'trolls' was that she was boosted 3 days before and then died.

But the statement doesnt say she was or was not boosted - just that she didnt die from that claim...which sounds like an obvious lie. And it reads like 'She died 3 days after a booster but no its totally not related'

Just like all the hundreds of athletes suddenly and 'mysteriously' dying right after shots, and 'no of course its not related how dare you think that'

But the way it is worded sure sounds like she was boosted right before.