Kazakhstan has been a Deep State asset where NGOs are well established there. The Soros Foundation-Kazakhstan (SFK) is part of the Open Society Foundations, which operates openly there. Soros has been the coordinator of a world-wide campaign concerning the use of oil revenue through his Open Society Institute. It is particularly active in the Caucasus and Caspian Sea oil basin. Kazakhstan is part of the Caspian Sea oil basin, which has been greatly over-hyped for the amount of oil reserves there.
The Afghanistan War was actually more about the building of a pipeline from the Caspian basin through Afghanistan to Karachi, Pakistan than capturing some terrorist living in a cave there. That was really the excuse and cover story to invade Afghanistan. What really occurred is that the Taliban, a former ally to the United States, refused Bush's offer to build and run the pipeline and instead went with an Argentina company (Bridas Argentina) pissing off Bush family. Enron had already bought up much of western India's power plants and the proposed pipeline was to bifurcate into India and provide the fuel for powering Enron's power plants. The rest was to be exported from the port of Karachi to a hungry European and Asian economy.
As I mentioned earlier, the Caspian Sea oil basin was greatly over-estimated. As far as I know, the pipeline was never built, Enron is gone, and all the investments made in Kazakhstan was wasted. Kazakhstan is still an oil producing nation, but not the titan that it was once thought it would be.
Kazakhstan was created out of a Russian territory by the Bolsheviks, and if Kazakhstan loses its head, Russia will need to correct this Bolshevik decision. The Kazakhstan government has enjoyed a friendly relationship with Moscow. I believe this relationship was a balancing act to show confidence to Moscow that Nur-Sultan (Astana) was a friend to Russia while anti-Russia Western NGOs and globalist interests permeated Kazakhstan. With the violence now occurring, Moscow isn't taking any chances. It is being reported they are sending in their military.
The vast majority of citizens in Kazakhstan were opposed to the name change of their capital to Nur-Sultan from Astana. This fact alone could provide a clue to how the people felt about their government. Some people are saying there may be 'Svidomism' (Russophobia) behind the violence now taking place. I don't believe this compares to the Maiden induced anti-Russia violence in the Ukraine. This would be indicative of Soros' hand being involved. But, this doesn't make any sense when Kazakhstan was already a Soros asset. The are Soros NGOs actively operating, but the revolt appears to stem from 'some' other source of frustration. The gas price hike being reported as the source of the revolt is far too simplified, but may be part of the overall issues the citizens are revolting over. It appears there are many factors existing for this revolt against the government. One thing for sure though.
Russia is not going to allow Kazakhstan to become another Ukraine.
Kazakhstan has been a Deep State asset where NGOs are well established there. The Soros Foundation-Kazakhstan (SFK) is part of the Open Society Foundations, which operates openly there. Soros has been the coordinator of a world-wide campaign concerning the use of oil revenue through his Open Society Institute. It is particularly active in the Caucasus and Caspian Sea oil basin. Kazakhstan is part of the Caspian Sea oil basin, which has been greatly over-hyped for the amount of oil reserves there.
The Afghanistan War was actually more about the building of a pipeline from the Caspian basin through Afghanistan to Karachi, Pakistan than capturing some terrorist living in a cave there. That was really the excuse and cover story to invade Afghanistan. What really occurred is that the Taliban, a former ally to the United States, refused Bush's offer to build and run the pipeline and instead went with an Argentina company (Bridas Argentina) pissing off Bush family. Enron had already bought up much of western India's power plants and the proposed pipeline was to bifurcate into India and provide the fuel for powering Enron's power plants. The rest was to be exported from the port of Karachi to a hungry European and Asian economy.
As I mentioned earlier, the Caspian Sea oil basin was greatly over-estimated. As far as I know, the pipeline was never built, Enron is gone, and all the investments made in Kazakhstan was wasted. Kazakhstan is still an oil producing nation, but not the titan that it was once thought it would be.
Kazakhstan was created out of a Russian territory by the Bolsheviks, and if Kazakhstan loses its head, Russia will need to correct this Bolshevik decision. The Kazakhstan government has enjoyed a friendly relationship with Moscow. I believe this relationship was a balancing act to show confidence to Moscow that Nur-Sultan (Astana) was a friend to Russia while anti-Russia Western NGOs and globalist interests permeated Kazakhstan. With the violence now occurring, Moscow isn't taking any chances. It is being reported they are sending in their military.
The vast majority of citizens in Kazakhstan were opposed to the name change of their capital to Nur-Sultan from Astana. This fact alone could provide a clue to how the people felt about their government. Some people are saying there may be 'Svidomism' (Russophobia) behind the violence now taking place. I don't believe this compares to the Maiden induced anti-Russia violence in the Ukraine. This would be indicative of Soros' hand being involved. But, this doesn't make any sense when Kazakhstan was already a Soros asset. The are Soros NGOs actively operating, but the revolt appears to stem from 'some' other source of frustration. The gas price hike being reported as the source of the revolt is far too simplified, but may be part of the overall issues the citizens are revolting over. It appears there are many factors existing for this revolt against the government. One thing for sure though.
Russia is not going to allow Kazakhstan to become another Ukraine.