The problem with this entire charade is that it assumes that the Vax does what it says it does. There is an all too willing suspension of disbelief. None of the data documents an ability to prevent contraction or transmission. Just the opposite in fact. So we are seeing a Supreme Court hearing based upon lies. This is the same as what we saw with regards to the FAUX election of 2020. You cannot have a legitimate, valid hearing without hearing all the facts. The public studies from Israel, Singapore, the UK etc. do NOT show the vax as effective. Just the opposite. There is absolutely no valid reason to call it a vax anymore. Why the continued, willing suspension of disbelief???? Who are they afraid of?
The problem with this entire charade is that it assumes that the Vax does what it says it does. There is an all too willing suspension of disbelief. None of the data documents an ability to prevent contraction or transmission. Just the opposite in fact. So we are seeing a Supreme Court hearing based upon lies. This is the same as what we saw with regards to the FAUX election of 2020. You cannot have a legitimate, valid hearing without hearing all the facts. The public studies from Israel, Singapore, the UK etc. do NOT show the vax as effective. Just the opposite. There is absolutely no valid reason to call it a vax anymore. Why the continued, willing suspension of disbelief???? Who are they afraid of?