My theory is it’s a natural first stage of grief - denial. As more news seeps slowly into even their subconscious that the jabs they so willingly embraced and have fervently defended may, in fact be dangerous, they’re choosing the ostrich-HITS (head-in-the-sand) coping method. Doing anything else would mean they have to admit that those they shunned (and worse) because they tried to warn them of the dangers were right and they, themselves, were wrong. And if they were wrong, that means they may have made one of the most colossally bad decisions of their lives. If they could just ignore the harsh reality slowly encroaching on their psyche and go back to pretending they haven’t screwed up royally, everything will work out right in the end.
They started to prep for the 2020 TV show/"election" in 2018 ... that's when they started their crackdown on free speech. TV influenced the Rats to believe that censorship is OK because of Bad Orange Man. Rats will fall in lockstep when the TV commands them to do so.
Also, they didn't want a place for Trump supporters to organize and meme the living fucking daylights out of the idiot Rats. The Rats had to take the House back so they could pull the impeachment bullshit. Moreover, I'm sure they didn't want the gap tooth pig in GA and the crackhead gay orgy guy in Florida to lose their shot at governorships too. All of the above had the added benefit of putting things in place for 2020, but doing it early enough to not make it look so obvious if they were to do it later.
Facebook could start a webpage called safebook and charge the users money for censorship. The money would be told it's being spent on world class censorshipers to help keep mean words down. Even can threaten no refund if you refuse to follow community standards. That would be genius.
But how did they make regular rank-and-file Democrat voters change their opinion about it so drastically in such a short amount of time? In 2018 when only 25% supported censorship, we were two years into the Trump Presidency. So it can't be explained by merely mentioning Orange Man
I'll take a stab at answering your question: Mass formation psychosis.
My theory is it’s a natural first stage of grief - denial. As more news seeps slowly into even their subconscious that the jabs they so willingly embraced and have fervently defended may, in fact be dangerous, they’re choosing the ostrich-HITS (head-in-the-sand) coping method. Doing anything else would mean they have to admit that those they shunned (and worse) because they tried to warn them of the dangers were right and they, themselves, were wrong. And if they were wrong, that means they may have made one of the most colossally bad decisions of their lives. If they could just ignore the harsh reality slowly encroaching on their psyche and go back to pretending they haven’t screwed up royally, everything will work out right in the end.
The next stage, incidentally, is anger.
That’s my guess.
Awesome analysis, fren.
I think you are on to something here.
"I only trust statistics that I falsified myself!" - Winston Churchill
They started to prep for the 2020 TV show/"election" in 2018 ... that's when they started their crackdown on free speech. TV influenced the Rats to believe that censorship is OK because of Bad Orange Man. Rats will fall in lockstep when the TV commands them to do so.
Also, they didn't want a place for Trump supporters to organize and meme the living fucking daylights out of the idiot Rats. The Rats had to take the House back so they could pull the impeachment bullshit. Moreover, I'm sure they didn't want the gap tooth pig in GA and the crackhead gay orgy guy in Florida to lose their shot at governorships too. All of the above had the added benefit of putting things in place for 2020, but doing it early enough to not make it look so obvious if they were to do it later.
Facebook could start a webpage called safebook and charge the users money for censorship. The money would be told it's being spent on world class censorshipers to help keep mean words down. Even can threaten no refund if you refuse to follow community standards. That would be genius.
Sauce:
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/december_2021/most_democrats_now_favor_social_media_censorship
Pravda
"How was that done?" Censoring the truth..
But how did they make regular rank-and-file Democrat voters change their opinion about it so drastically in such a short amount of time? In 2018 when only 25% supported censorship, we were two years into the Trump Presidency. So it can't be explained by merely mentioning Orange Man
If the "media" spoke the truth and did not censor it, we would not be here...we have all been told one narrative...us on here did not fsll for it.