This 'THERE WERE NO PLANES on 9/11' bullshit was specifically designed to divide the public and alienate 1000's of New Yorkers and the World that saw Flight 175 crash into the South Tower. Also, it takes away from the legitimate argument that NO PLANES were at the Pentagon and Shanksville. - The Great Awakening

This 'THERE WERE NO PLANES on 9/11' bullshit was specifically designed to divide the public and alienate 1000's of New Yorkers and the World that saw Flight 175 crash into the South Tower. Also, it takes away from the legitimate argument that NO PLANES were at the Pentagon and Shanksville. (www.youtube.com)

posted 2 years ago by Oh_Well_ian 2 years ago by Oh_Well_ian +47 / -1

56 comments

56 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (56)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– Oh_Well_ian [S] 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

100% garbage

you are holographic

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -1 ▼

– Silo101 -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

You have any proof that they werent? Oh maybe the still inflated tire at ground zero? Cause ya know a whole building is destroyed by a plane, but that tire was just extremely tough...

The tire ITSELF proves there was no planes. Why bring in a perfectly good tire unless it was to sell the plane narrative? Or do you really believe every other part of the plane disintegrated, along with like 70% of the building, yet the tire survived?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Oh_Well_ian [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

debunk every video in the OP or STFU

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q