Alito was the one asking the better questions, Thomas seemed more neutral for the time being. But I get what you're saying, either one would be better than Kagan or Sotomayor.
But the point was needing more justices who were more neutral, which you just stated Thomas was. That's a good thing.
Neutrality is important. Their only role is in making a judgement on whether something is Constitutional or not -- as written, however, not some "modern interpretation"
Alito was the one asking the better questions, Thomas seemed more neutral for the time being. But I get what you're saying, either one would be better than Kagan or Sotomayor.
But the point was needing more justices who were more neutral, which you just stated Thomas was. That's a good thing.
Neutrality is important. Their only role is in making a judgement on whether something is Constitutional or not -- as written, however, not some "modern interpretation"
Yes, absolutely. Obviously we know how Sotomayor is gonna lean every time and should expect no less from Obummer's appointee.