But the point was needing more justices who were more neutral, which you just stated Thomas was. That's a good thing.
Neutrality is important. Their only role is in making a judgement on whether something is Constitutional or not -- as written, however, not some "modern interpretation"
But the point was needing more justices who were more neutral, which you just stated Thomas was. That's a good thing.
Neutrality is important. Their only role is in making a judgement on whether something is Constitutional or not -- as written, however, not some "modern interpretation"
Yes, absolutely. Obviously we know how Sotomayor is gonna lean every time and should expect no less from Obummer's appointee.