ONE form within ALL flow. Everything you perceive represents a differentiated ONE (form) out of a differentiating ALL (flow). Inspiration can only be communicated by the movement (flow) of perceived differences (form).
Question "one person" by person (per sonos aka by sound) first aka what does it imply to be ONE resound to ALL sound? What does another resound represents for ONEself within ALL perceived sound?
Ask yourself...do you represent ONE within ALL? Do others represent each ONE within ALL? What doesn't represent being ONE within ALL? Also...represents implies responding (choice) to presented (perception).
Oh! I get it. Let me explain it as simply as I can.
ONE, as differentiated between ONE and the other ONE (life force vs flow versus form) was never taught to you in school. One reason One is never shown to be equal or not equal to One is that? In other words, flow (not life) when not taught in classrooms (not flow) LIFE begins to permeate into reality with only One or the Other. (Not both, as you can see in Bob Cavet's video) they were never in the sonos (not sonos) audibly connected to the basis of the flow (not flow.)
Question flow (inception towards death) representing force of velocity (forward movement), and form (life) representing force of resistance (choice based adaptation to balance).
Afterwards; question if ongoing flow causes a momentum that represents the balance; within which temporary form has the choice to perceive; to adapt; to grow...
After that...question why you suggest a "versus" (imbalance) within a perceived balance?
One reason One is never shown to be equal or not equal to One is that?
Shown implies suggested information; which for choice represents want vs not want; hence ignoring perceived everything for suggested nothing. Your example of equal (want) vs not equal (not want) represents the conflict of reason caused by consenting to suggested information (thought education).
As for equality...ALL represents ONE in energy; while each ONE within ALL represents a self differentiation of energy into potentiality (loss through flow) and potential (growth of form). The parasites suggest the opposites by trying to shape us equal as to destroy the differentiation (through miscegenation); which in return corrupts our perception of differences (communicated inspiration).
All the differences one perceives are used to inspire one to sustain self by resisting as form within flow (balancing by choice).
flow (not life)
What if life (form) exists within the momentum (balance) of flow? What are the implications of calling something (form) within everything (flow)...nothing (not life)?
flow when not taught in classrooms (not flow) LIFE begins to permeate into reality
Flow represents the foundation for all form; and the majority of us chooses to ignore it for the suggestions of other form. As being alive; you cannot perceive your inception and your death; because you are balancing as form in-between the momentum of flow. Yet; you can easily understand your own beginning (inception) and end (death) by adapting to what you perceive through the responses to others being moved.
This is how form can perceive everything within momentum of flow; yet only comprehend the flow causing it. Growing this comprehension is why one perceives movement as inspiration to respond to. Comprehending to represent ONE within ALL aka form within flow; choice within balance; temporary within ongoing; potential within potentiality; growth within loss; chaos within order; magnetic resistance within electric velocity represents self discernment.
Only after growing self discernment can one further comprehend that ALL represents ONE in energy; after which one has a foundation to build assumption upon; because the only thing that cannot change within constant change are the rules that define how change operates; which represent the laws of nature for the responding form within. Perception and comprehension have to put into balance first aka kept within momentum by adaptation to perceived inspiration.
I honestly cannot make sense of even one of your sentences. I have to assume you are doing this intentionally, perhaps to aggressively forum slide. If you're serving up that much random word salad at least offer people some dressing with that. Done here.
That implies "can-not(hing) make sense" aka ignorance of perceived everything for suggested nothing. Making sense implies ignoring to perceive everything through ones senses. You read and chose to respond to something you sensed; while suggesting that it cannot make sense.
We are being manipulated to behave like this...to ignore perception; to ignore senses, and to view anything suggested through a conflict (reason). No other one can change your consent to being manipulated like; only ones own choice can do that. I cannot give you understanding; I can try to point out the deception of suggested information; while making it uncomfortable for others to keep ignoring perceived inspiration; but alas....free will of choice is upon oneself.
I have to assume
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) one exists within constant change; which means one can only assume; never define.
you are doing this intentionally
I respond as choice to balance for self sustenance; because I "need" to; not because I "want" to suggest information to others. I instead use others as inspiration to adapt to.
You on the other hand are making the choice to "want" suggested information over the "need" of adapting to perceived inspiration, and I can only point it out; not change your own choice for you.
to aggressively forum slide
This aggression you perceive from suggested information represents the conflict of reason (want vs not want). It ignores need (respond to balance) for want (imbalance). I simply adapt to whatever is on the front-page: followed by however others adapt to it. Neither do I offer (starting threads); not do I judge (no up/down votes), and mostly I don't even read which forum or usernames I respond to.
You can utilize this by throwing at me whatever inspires you; and I will take it apart by putting it into my understanding of natural law; while pointing out the suggested corruptions of our parasitic few; which in return grows my own understanding. You can also ignore it; be offended; trying to attack the source of information you don't want or lack to understand etc. It's your free will of choice.
ONE form within ALL flow. Everything you perceive represents a differentiated ONE (form) out of a differentiating ALL (flow). Inspiration can only be communicated by the movement (flow) of perceived differences (form).
Question "one person" by person (per sonos aka by sound) first aka what does it imply to be ONE resound to ALL sound? What does another resound represents for ONEself within ALL perceived sound?
Ask yourself...do you represent ONE within ALL? Do others represent each ONE within ALL? What doesn't represent being ONE within ALL? Also...represents implies responding (choice) to presented (perception).
Oh! I get it. Let me explain it as simply as I can.
ONE, as differentiated between ONE and the other ONE (life force vs flow versus form) was never taught to you in school. One reason One is never shown to be equal or not equal to One is that? In other words, flow (not life) when not taught in classrooms (not flow) LIFE begins to permeate into reality with only One or the Other. (Not both, as you can see in Bob Cavet's video) they were never in the sonos (not sonos) audibly connected to the basis of the flow (not flow.)
It's perfectly clear now, thank you.
Question flow (inception towards death) representing force of velocity (forward movement), and form (life) representing force of resistance (choice based adaptation to balance).
Afterwards; question if ongoing flow causes a momentum that represents the balance; within which temporary form has the choice to perceive; to adapt; to grow...
After that...question why you suggest a "versus" (imbalance) within a perceived balance?
Shown implies suggested information; which for choice represents want vs not want; hence ignoring perceived everything for suggested nothing. Your example of equal (want) vs not equal (not want) represents the conflict of reason caused by consenting to suggested information (thought education).
As for equality...ALL represents ONE in energy; while each ONE within ALL represents a self differentiation of energy into potentiality (loss through flow) and potential (growth of form). The parasites suggest the opposites by trying to shape us equal as to destroy the differentiation (through miscegenation); which in return corrupts our perception of differences (communicated inspiration).
All the differences one perceives are used to inspire one to sustain self by resisting as form within flow (balancing by choice).
What if life (form) exists within the momentum (balance) of flow? What are the implications of calling something (form) within everything (flow)...nothing (not life)?
Flow represents the foundation for all form; and the majority of us chooses to ignore it for the suggestions of other form. As being alive; you cannot perceive your inception and your death; because you are balancing as form in-between the momentum of flow. Yet; you can easily understand your own beginning (inception) and end (death) by adapting to what you perceive through the responses to others being moved.
This is how form can perceive everything within momentum of flow; yet only comprehend the flow causing it. Growing this comprehension is why one perceives movement as inspiration to respond to. Comprehending to represent ONE within ALL aka form within flow; choice within balance; temporary within ongoing; potential within potentiality; growth within loss; chaos within order; magnetic resistance within electric velocity represents self discernment.
Only after growing self discernment can one further comprehend that ALL represents ONE in energy; after which one has a foundation to build assumption upon; because the only thing that cannot change within constant change are the rules that define how change operates; which represent the laws of nature for the responding form within. Perception and comprehension have to put into balance first aka kept within momentum by adaptation to perceived inspiration.
Thank you for the inspiration.
I honestly cannot make sense of even one of your sentences. I have to assume you are doing this intentionally, perhaps to aggressively forum slide. If you're serving up that much random word salad at least offer people some dressing with that. Done here.
That implies "can-not(hing) make sense" aka ignorance of perceived everything for suggested nothing. Making sense implies ignoring to perceive everything through ones senses. You read and chose to respond to something you sensed; while suggesting that it cannot make sense.
We are being manipulated to behave like this...to ignore perception; to ignore senses, and to view anything suggested through a conflict (reason). No other one can change your consent to being manipulated like; only ones own choice can do that. I cannot give you understanding; I can try to point out the deception of suggested information; while making it uncomfortable for others to keep ignoring perceived inspiration; but alas....free will of choice is upon oneself.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) one exists within constant change; which means one can only assume; never define.
I respond as choice to balance for self sustenance; because I "need" to; not because I "want" to suggest information to others. I instead use others as inspiration to adapt to.
You on the other hand are making the choice to "want" suggested information over the "need" of adapting to perceived inspiration, and I can only point it out; not change your own choice for you.
This aggression you perceive from suggested information represents the conflict of reason (want vs not want). It ignores need (respond to balance) for want (imbalance). I simply adapt to whatever is on the front-page: followed by however others adapt to it. Neither do I offer (starting threads); not do I judge (no up/down votes), and mostly I don't even read which forum or usernames I respond to.
You can utilize this by throwing at me whatever inspires you; and I will take it apart by putting it into my understanding of natural law; while pointing out the suggested corruptions of our parasitic few; which in return grows my own understanding. You can also ignore it; be offended; trying to attack the source of information you don't want or lack to understand etc. It's your free will of choice.