"...that the DOD rejected the program proposal because vaccines would be ineffective..."
"...and that the DOD now mandates vaccines that copy the spike protein previously deemed too dangerous. To me, and to those who informed my analysis, this situation meets no-go or abort criteria with regards to the vaccines until the toxicity of the spike protein can be investigated. There's also information within the documents about which drugs effectively treat the program;s SARS-CoVs."
[Note the mention of alternate, effective drugs, i.e. ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. This is important, IMO. It shows that there is no need to mandate a vaccine, as there are other effective medications.]
I would highly suggest that you print out the entire document and read it carefully. It is unfortunate that it has such a large watermark, but printing it out ought to make it a bit easier to read.
I was reading the part last about this virus being from a vaccine. Pure nonsense. I didn’t read the rest but that calls into question the whole thing right?
What the fuck. I just spent 30 minutes reading these docs. Major Murphys findings are extremely significant. This SHOULD be the nail in the coffin for many public officials and the mainstream media.
Can you point me to where in the document it says the military knew the vaccines are not effective? I'm having trouble finding it. Thanks, fren!
Is there a specific page that is most prevalent? Military here and want to run something by the JAGS and my commander ASAP
It's on the first page, third paragraph:
"...that the DOD rejected the program proposal because vaccines would be ineffective..."
"...and that the DOD now mandates vaccines that copy the spike protein previously deemed too dangerous. To me, and to those who informed my analysis, this situation meets no-go or abort criteria with regards to the vaccines until the toxicity of the spike protein can be investigated. There's also information within the documents about which drugs effectively treat the program;s SARS-CoVs."
[Note the mention of alternate, effective drugs, i.e. ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. This is important, IMO. It shows that there is no need to mandate a vaccine, as there are other effective medications.]
I would highly suggest that you print out the entire document and read it carefully. It is unfortunate that it has such a large watermark, but printing it out ought to make it a bit easier to read.
https://assets.ctfassets.net/syq3snmxclc9/2mVob3c1aDd8CNvVnyei6n/95af7dbfd2958d4c2b8494048b4889b5/JAG_Docs_pt1_Og_WATERMARK_OVER_Redacted.pdf
Thanks a ton!!
No problem, fren. I hope it helps!
I was reading the part last about this virus being from a vaccine. Pure nonsense. I didn’t read the rest but that calls into question the whole thing right?
I'm super suspicious of this whole document. It's just too convenient.
I found something else that may help you, fren:
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/hidden-military-documents-reveal-nih-intent-create-sars-cov-2-using-gain-function-research
Thank you!!
Good luck, fren. Keep us posted!
The email the major guy typed up, first page . Says "the vaccines would be ineffective" , referring to the second documents mRNA vaccine.
Same, I don't see anything like that.
Also, why wouldn't PV just link to this?
What the fuck. I just spent 30 minutes reading these docs. Major Murphys findings are extremely significant. This SHOULD be the nail in the coffin for many public officials and the mainstream media.
Ugh I want to slap these people...
Thanks, fren. I was looking in the wrong place.