Assuming Darwinian Evolution to be true (which I don't), the appearance of Carbon based life form appearing was a highly unlikely event. And it took roughly 11 billion years to do it. Certain physical parameters had to be met in order for Carbon based life to appear (Star formation, Galaxy formation etc...). To say that there is ANOTHER "more advanced" life form out there stretches the Darwinian mechanisms too far. Now we wan't to say a more advanced life form appeared by purely natural, unguided, physical processes somewhere else in the Universe?? In LESS time than it took Carbon based life to form?? So now, Darwinian Evolution has happened twice??
Sorry, not enough time in the Universe's life to accommodate that. This is my Natural Philosophy argument for no Advanced Aliens.
What bothers me most about this kind of perspective is that it is very 'human focused' where, by definition, life around another sun would develop a very different perspective on similar lines.
Modern humans have really only existed for ~75k years (might vary depending on where the line is drawn) where dinosaurs went extinct about 65 million years ago. If that track had shifted to where dinosaurs would have carried on towards a human-type evolution path, they might have had a human-level society that could be ~60 million years old.
So, frankly, I don't see it as 'impossible' for life somewhere in the galaxy to have evolved 1-2 billion years earlier.
I think the timeline we've been taught is whack. They're finding hammers, wagon wheels, and metal pots deep in the earth "where they shouldn't be" according to narrative. It supports major cataclysm burying ancient civilization. It debunks a lot of layers-mean-years theory. There are questionable surfaces that possess prints of creatures from different alleged eras. People go out of their way to destroy these a lot of times. They are the gatekeepers. The keepers of the know. Secret enforcers.
Oh, absolutely. The 10-12000 year modern history seems to fit far more. Frankly, humanity has been unchanged for at least that 50k-75k years, which at the least implies that there's no real reason why a civilization of comparable technology could have been built and rebuilt from scratch. Nothing genetically should preclude that.
Until that gets established as an equal unknown or estimate, it's generally safe to assume that MSM version.
Assuming Darwinian Evolution to be true (which I don't), the appearance of Carbon based life form appearing was a highly unlikely event. And it took roughly 11 billion years to do it. Certain physical parameters had to be met in order for Carbon based life to appear (Star formation, Galaxy formation etc...). To say that there is ANOTHER "more advanced" life form out there stretches the Darwinian mechanisms too far. Now we wan't to say a more advanced life form appeared by purely natural, unguided, physical processes somewhere else in the Universe?? In LESS time than it took Carbon based life to form?? So now, Darwinian Evolution has happened twice??
Sorry, not enough time in the Universe's life to accommodate that. This is my Natural Philosophy argument for no Advanced Aliens.
The existence of Demons, however....
What bothers me most about this kind of perspective is that it is very 'human focused' where, by definition, life around another sun would develop a very different perspective on similar lines.
Modern humans have really only existed for ~75k years (might vary depending on where the line is drawn) where dinosaurs went extinct about 65 million years ago. If that track had shifted to where dinosaurs would have carried on towards a human-type evolution path, they might have had a human-level society that could be ~60 million years old.
So, frankly, I don't see it as 'impossible' for life somewhere in the galaxy to have evolved 1-2 billion years earlier.
I think the timeline we've been taught is whack. They're finding hammers, wagon wheels, and metal pots deep in the earth "where they shouldn't be" according to narrative. It supports major cataclysm burying ancient civilization. It debunks a lot of layers-mean-years theory. There are questionable surfaces that possess prints of creatures from different alleged eras. People go out of their way to destroy these a lot of times. They are the gatekeepers. The keepers of the know. Secret enforcers.
Oh, absolutely. The 10-12000 year modern history seems to fit far more. Frankly, humanity has been unchanged for at least that 50k-75k years, which at the least implies that there's no real reason why a civilization of comparable technology could have been built and rebuilt from scratch. Nothing genetically should preclude that.
Until that gets established as an equal unknown or estimate, it's generally safe to assume that MSM version.