Yes, this is an important point that many people miss. Everyone is not digging into information from "questionable" sources. When DARPA comes out and agrees with what your "questionable" research found it's a great opportunity to present this newly found "validated" information to regular people. You present the DARPA info and also the old information from the "questionable" source. Then you help them connect the two. If "questionable" source was right about this thing, what else might they be right about? This line of thinking leads to a perpetual state of rabbit hole seeking and eventual red pilling without much further effort on your part.
Yes, this is an important point that many people miss. Everyone is not digging into information from "questionable" sources. When DARPA comes out and agrees with what your "questionable" research found it's a great opportunity to present this newly found "validated" information to regular people. You present the DARPA info and also the old information from the "questionable" source. Then you help them connect the two. If "questionable" source was right about this thing, what else might they be right about? This line of thinking leads to a perpetual state of rabbit hole seeking and eventual red pilling without much further effort on your part.
👌