.....
Has the "common cold" actually been a long series of corona viruses in a continuing pattern of ever evolving mutation?
Not simply one consistent strain? As in, "I've got a cold."
Have we actually been having a different variant of the "cold" virus each and every time?
If so, does that show that new variants of corona virus have been with us for many years?
If this is the case then it would seem that the main difference between today's cv19 mutations and cold and flu viruses of the past is the widespread promotion.
Preaching to the choir, I know.
Just thinking through some ammunition to help the uninformed on their way.
If this can be shown it seems like it could be a powerful argument.
Thank you for reading.
.....
Early in 2020, a German researcher published some interesting results.
Every year, the Germans try to isolate and count the number of viruses people get, what symptoms, etc...
In 2020, the researcher published that there were new, but unremarkable, coronaviruses, and that they had no more significant health effects than previous years.
In short, one of these scenarios happened in 2019/2020:
Either way, the so-called covid tests were complete bunk from the beginning. I could've told you that just looking at the earliest graphs that were released when testing became available. When people with symptoms have the same positivity rate as people without symptoms, you are just detecting random noise.
Anyway, with access to all the data available, in its raw form, and accounting for the fact that the CDC admitted, a LONG time ago, that only 6% of people who die WITH covid have 1 or fewer co-morbidities (and thus could perhaps be due to covid), you would find the mortality rate per infection is in line with the common cold, which makes it much less dangerous than the flu.
But again, you could've looked at the mortality rate along with the age of the people who died and figured that out. In 2020, I was telling my friends my proof that getting covid means you will live longer, because that was what the data was saying. If you tested positive for covid, you were less likely to die in 2 weeks than if you did not.
You didnt even have to look at the earliest graphs to know the tests were bunk because the inventor already said they were before that...
Thank you.