One early question I had about the vax was simple: why two shots? Every other vax, ever, was one shot until now. No scientific explanation, real or fake. And it was never answered, until now. The answer had been bobbing in my head for a while, but it all clicked reading a post by u/369Q, https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/141EriO1eS/x/c , about how to drain a swamp that so deep and wide that it pervades nearly every institution in our country and world at some level. Here's the theory:
The vaccination program is not medicine. It's a filtration program for society, designed specifically to find and remove the many separate cells of corruption in all its many forms. Visit #1 is saline for you, but for the military it's the starting gun to do their background check to see if you're on the naughty list or not. If you are naughty, they know, and they take action: visit #2 is a bad lot with a tracker, or a worse lot with a lethal dose. In some cases they might do a house call in-between. If you're clean, #2 is also saline. Each round of boosters reflects an expanding naughty list, as new intelligence comes in.
This meshes perfectly with Trump's messaging that everybody should get the vaccine. Think about it: if you're at war, is it better to corner your enemies and dig them out of their rabbit holes in vicious destructive firefights? Or to slowly and methodically ferret them out by investigating their social networks and phone calls? The answer is obvious. Did Trump get the vaccine? Yes, but what that really means is that he passed his background check, including the booster. When he tells the crowd not to boo, he says "you don't realize, you're playing intro their hands" because he knows that this approach to warfare saves millions of lives.
This is also why leftist politicians are pushing the vax so hard. Trudeau, Macron, and Dan Andrews all were likely trapped in a room individually with special forces and given a choice: do you want to be quarantined right here and now with "Covid," never to return, or will you go back out to the public and strongly encourage, using your symbolism comms and bully pulpit, your network of corrupt supporters to go get processed through the court system that we're calling the vaccination program? They are left twisting in the wind, forced to choose between keeping their necks for themselves, or pushing to destroy the corrupt network that gave them power. If they didn't agree, they were taken out and the next player in line was approached.
That's not to say that covid was entirely a white hat operation. Only that it was successfully infiltrated and used against them. Test any and all of Trump's statements against this theory. It all fits.
TLDR- the vaccine is not a medicine, it's a background check program, complete with sentencing. Most people come out fine; DS & minions get the axe.
The game is over when the public knows.
But until the public knows, it is contained.
Straight-up Q. No wonder he said "the hardest decision I ever had to make." Wow.
Thanks, but I'll take my chances on remaining pure blooded. The Feds (both good and bad) know EXACTLY who and what I am. They all know who and what my family is. This notion of "vaxxing" everyone just to see if they'll take the bait is clumsy at best. If Trump and Q have/had all the names already, why go thru the trouble of pushing all this onto us?! Makes no sense. Just to catch some small fry's who may have slipped thru the cracks in [their] system? Doesn't make sense to me. Out of the top 1%, there's only a percentage of them that would qualify as being a Cabalite. Much easier to analyze comms using NSA's super computers than to "vaxx" the world.
IF Q/Trump have it all, like Q days they do, the easiest route to take would be to let COVID surface and expand across the globe, "vaxx" those dumb enough to take the vaccine, let nature run its course by purging the weakest of our gene pool to help usher in a new age for Humanity of healthier humans (which we'll need in the yrs to come), and then go after those responsible for the misery using our SpecOps guys, try them in whatever court of law befits [their] crimes (either military tribunals and civilian courts, also Nuremberg 1.0), and move on from there.
Disagree about ease. It's more like: if there are 50 armed terrorists holed up in a town of 3,000 people, a direct assault produces more innocent casualties and friendly deaths than a plan to pick them up one by one as they travel to the well. That's true if you know who they are or not. It's even more true if there's 75 terrorists but you've only identified 50, with a process to identify the rest.
I'm not taking it either. I feel no need to submit to a review process to determine if I'm a traitor.
But it addresses Trump's statements perfectly, AND addresses the difficulty expressed in 369Q's post, which is a serious issue and directly reflects the nature of the war.