SCOTUS rules the Biden Vaccine Mandate is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Thank you God ๐๐ป
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
It is a good thing, yes, however SCOTUS did not stop Federally Mandated Vaccines. This effects Hospital workers, Any Hospitals that accept Medicaid patients are being held hostage to the Mandates. Also the Military this make me very f*#% ing Angry. people on TV calling this a WIN... NOT
Maybe this is the first step into GETTING THE GOVERNMENT OUT OF HEALTHCARE
Yes, you are correct. I share your anger times 10.
Absolutely - although it could've been a lot worse, this is still a major loss.
What really ticks me off is that even the organizations and lawyers who are fighting the mandates are fucking stupid. All of them are very pro-vax and use the hysterical covid/omicron verbiage. We need people to fight this shit based on the reality that the jab (at best) doesn't work, PCR tests are fake, and covid is just rebranded cold&flu season.
I totally agree!!
People will not stop acting this way. Itโs not so much stupidity as it is tribalism.
With great respect and I mean no ill will toward you or anyone here, we can find tribal behavior in any social construct. In fact they accuse you of it, โcultโ mentality.
They accuse you and you accuse them. I can admit I act toward tribe rules around others. We may go out drinking with friends and do shit we would have never done alone. Or not talk to someone who isnโt displaying the rewarded traits our tribe likes best when around people but then find that person fine when we are alone.
I think itโs something we should redpill ourselves with and accept. We are still in the jungle respecting traits that are in vogue or displaying attitudes that are popular. For fucks sake for a half a millennium people thought white wigs were very in style for men.
If we were in that social group, weโd wear wigs too and also like it. Socialization in primates is responsible for stupid things.
This decision was about the authority of OSHA. The mandates themselves were not struck down. That will have to be challenged in other cases on the merits of the mandates themselves. People in healthcare are still subjected because of the arm twisting of HHS/CMS funding. SCOTUS once again shows its inability and unwillingness to weigh in on important issues facing the country and continues to ride the fence. However, it is still a victory - even if it is a small one.
The only way we are going to stop this madness is to go after the liability shields of the manufacturers. By removing that shield they will promptly cease all vaxxine distribution. This is where our focus needs to be. Not that these other cases for injunctions are not important to help fix more immediate problems - but we cannot take our eyes off the long game here at bringing the beast down.
You are right but challenging the rights of wealthy corporations is like overturning the worlds power. You do think big, thatโs crazzzzy dude.
Wait, I just forgot where I was at. Kek
Thanks, but some others have beaten me to it. There are several cases in the works, not just here but in Europe as well, that are attempting to bring criminal charges against several of the manufacturers over malicious intent to falsify data etc. It must be criminal - which these guys have been criminally charged and found guilty in the past. So, this is nothing new. Criminal intent is what will break their liability shield. If they think they will be sued, they will pack up the tent and head out. This is why they have targeted the kids - if they can get these kill shots put on the children's vaxxine schedule, all of the other jabs are grandfathered in under the childhood vaxxine liability shield.
These cases are bigger than before because it may involve all of the makers of the jabs. It appears they may have colluded together to experiment on the public by releasing dosing changes at different times that can be tracked by publicly available data. That is conspiracy to commit the crimes.
We are at war and it is going to take some AGs or DAs with big enough balls to take this on. Once I think we get the first one or two onboard, more will join. There is safety in numbers.
I understand it is just this ruling does not help my daughter that works at a hospital.