The queen has chosen not to save him. There are consequences (at last!) and she’s invoking them. Few, if any, of the other perpetrators will be called to similar account.
I agree; she’s no saint. But the central driver in her personality is an adherence to duty. Her actions tell me that she knows that Andrew has abandoned his and must face the consequences. Continuing to support him would invalidate everything she stands for.
Other sources say stripped of all titles and patronages. Guys, this is a big deal. The Royal Family can't even save one of its own. Who's in control?
The queen has chosen not to save him. There are consequences (at last!) and she’s invoking them. Few, if any, of the other perpetrators will be called to similar account.
the queen's no saint either.
She’s a lizard, actually.
She may be the only person left of the cognoscenti in Europe who actually knows how to function as a parent.
“You screwed up big time, Andrew! You’re grounded! And your allowance is completely cut off!”
The rest of them, whether royalty, elected, or appointed? Business as usual…
I don't believe that! Source?
I agree; she’s no saint. But the central driver in her personality is an adherence to duty. Her actions tell me that she knows that Andrew has abandoned his and must face the consequences. Continuing to support him would invalidate everything she stands for.
Can you imagine that conversation with his parents? When they found out?
I can, snicker.