I like how he deflects the question by essentially calling the book's existence a baseless conspiracy theory (or, well, the continued implication that all conspiracy theories are somehow baseless) then when a letter is presented backpedals and says that it was just an automatic thank you letter for the book.
If you get caught in a lie once, your next lie 30 seconds later is not going to be seen as anything but.
I like how he deflects the question by essentially calling the book's existence a baseless conspiracy theory (or, well, the continued implication that all conspiracy theories are somehow baseless) then when a letter is presented backpedals and says that it was just an automatic thank you letter for the book.
If you get caught in a lie once, your next lie 30 seconds later is not going to be seen as anything but.