There are legitimate reasons. Nothing really there in terms of resources, so cost effectiveness isn't there.
You would expect some colonization but apparently not. Weirdly enough, what gets me isn't that we don't send people there right now, but that we haven't sent more remote probes and such up there. It would be expensive, yes, but due to proximity we could use better equipment and physically return if we had to, not to mention better real time commands. Really weird and something I hadn't thought of until now.
I am not someone who doubts the moon landing, but I have seen some things that makes me question if things have really gone exactly as we were told
Watch jay Weidner reality check. He is a film guy and knows Stanley Kubrick did the moon landing and they were done in uk where he was living. Evidence based ..
As the freemasons say themselves they lost the plans. Can't get through the van Allen belt. Radiation would fry them.
Challenger crew supposedly dead in explosion..still working in their home towns..teaching etc.ccdidnt bother tochise identity
The answer is very simple and straight forth from a financial aspect alone...
365 (days) X 62 (years) with funding on average of $55,000,000 dollars a day from tax payers...
They had $1,244,650,000,000 reasons to lie...
The deep state netted 100's of BILLIONS of dollars. They put that money in God knows what...
(All I can say is WHY?... Being a devout Christian. when asked to swear on the bible that we did in fact land on the moon he fucking went apeshit on the "interviewer/reporter and refused...WHY??)
Again....Just to make it clear...This is not a post about Conspiracies/moon landings/etc...Its about MONEY!!
I agree and think we should be talking about the moon, money, and freemason Aldrin. Q tells us the Kennedys are relevant, and both JFK and JFKJR talked about the moon. I always thought JFK sounded like he was challenging them to make the trip, like he knew it wasn't possible the way they had planned.
and interesting that there's a moon on the 1997 SGTF edition of george magazine...
The refusal to swear on the Bible has always confused me. Why not just swear on the Bible regardless of the truth? If you're a satanist, what's the big deal? After all, you worship the Father of Lies, so what's one more lie? There must be some reason they're so adverse to swearing on the Bible. Is it just a legal issue? Can it be considered giving testimony under oath?
I did this once in court but I don’t sware on anything I haven’t open read and agree 100% on. The masons run the courts some pages could be satanic in that bible. And oops now what have you done. My 2.5 cents.
NASA is one of the greatest fraud/deceptions ever. Truly amazing. 'Outer Space' is fifty miles up. 'Space is hard' as the elite have said. 50 years after traveling 238,000 miles one way through all sorts of unknowns using primitive technology, several times, going 50 miles up is still the domain of a few dozen a year on average, nearly all military. Space companies put a few people up into 'outer space' recently. 50 miles up for a few minutes of free fall. Fraud.
There are many religions, including so called "christians" in ZOG. I believe money had become the religion for the Satanists..however I do agree with you.
As Russianvids points out, everything their science says is true just so happens to go against biblical scriptures. Aleister Crowley told his followers to learn to walk, talk, and think backwards. When you see everything has been reversed, things start making sense
I have had 5 rampant Nasaist's read wagging the moondoggle (free online) and all come away shaking their heads looking sheepish and saying 'how could i be so fucking dumb'
The moon was so important that we haven't bothered to go back in a half century.
There are legitimate reasons. Nothing really there in terms of resources, so cost effectiveness isn't there.
You would expect some colonization but apparently not. Weirdly enough, what gets me isn't that we don't send people there right now, but that we haven't sent more remote probes and such up there. It would be expensive, yes, but due to proximity we could use better equipment and physically return if we had to, not to mention better real time commands. Really weird and something I hadn't thought of until now.
I am not someone who doubts the moon landing, but I have seen some things that makes me question if things have really gone exactly as we were told
The Japanese and Russian have both sent rovers I believe.
Well fuck our government then
Watch jay Weidner reality check. He is a film guy and knows Stanley Kubrick did the moon landing and they were done in uk where he was living. Evidence based ..
As the freemasons say themselves they lost the plans. Can't get through the van Allen belt. Radiation would fry them.
Challenger crew supposedly dead in explosion..still working in their home towns..teaching etc.ccdidnt bother tochise identity
Apolo is Sun they were studying the sun. O.o
Apollo beat Rocky at the end of Rocky 3
Apollo is the sun. The moon is rocky.
The Sun beat the Moon.
We landed on the Sun first.
The answer is very simple and straight forth from a financial aspect alone...
365 (days) X 62 (years) with funding on average of $55,000,000 dollars a day from tax payers...
They had $1,244,650,000,000 reasons to lie...
The deep state netted 100's of BILLIONS of dollars. They put that money in God knows what...
(All I can say is WHY?... Being a devout Christian. when asked to swear on the bible that we did in fact land on the moon he fucking went apeshit on the "interviewer/reporter and refused...WHY??)
Again....Just to make it clear...This is not a post about Conspiracies/moon landings/etc...Its about MONEY!!
I agree and think we should be talking about the moon, money, and freemason Aldrin. Q tells us the Kennedys are relevant, and both JFK and JFKJR talked about the moon. I always thought JFK sounded like he was challenging them to make the trip, like he knew it wasn't possible the way they had planned.
and interesting that there's a moon on the 1997 SGTF edition of george magazine...
https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2021/02/07/jfk-jr-how-did-george-know/
👌👊
The refusal to swear on the Bible has always confused me. Why not just swear on the Bible regardless of the truth? If you're a satanist, what's the big deal? After all, you worship the Father of Lies, so what's one more lie? There must be some reason they're so adverse to swearing on the Bible. Is it just a legal issue? Can it be considered giving testimony under oath?
I did this once in court but I don’t sware on anything I haven’t open read and agree 100% on. The masons run the courts some pages could be satanic in that bible. And oops now what have you done. My 2.5 cents.
I was referring to Buzz Aldrin's refusal to swear on the Bible.
Qui bono?
Those who monitor the satellites.
Key to the castle.
NASA is one of the greatest fraud/deceptions ever. Truly amazing. 'Outer Space' is fifty miles up. 'Space is hard' as the elite have said. 50 years after traveling 238,000 miles one way through all sorts of unknowns using primitive technology, several times, going 50 miles up is still the domain of a few dozen a year on average, nearly all military. Space companies put a few people up into 'outer space' recently. 50 miles up for a few minutes of free fall. Fraud.
wym by the space is hard?
Branson on Virgin Galactic crash: 'Space flight is hard -- but worth it'
A sharp engineer once coined that expression after a space mission failure
Stop saying 'space is hard' It makes us feel good, but it also makes us weak
Water is wet. In 50 years, 50 miles up should be not as 'hard'.
Richard Branson has his own Epstein island and is very deep state. Believe nothing he says
Always has been..(((who))) pushes that narrative? Once you put the last piece in the puzzle, everything else makes sense.
There are many religions, including so called "christians" in ZOG. I believe money had become the religion for the Satanists..however I do agree with you.
Y.E.S.
As Russianvids points out, everything their science says is true just so happens to go against biblical scriptures. Aleister Crowley told his followers to learn to walk, talk, and think backwards. When you see everything has been reversed, things start making sense
NASA= Never A Straight Answer...
666 - that couldn’t be more obvious.
I don't know what to believe..I do know (((they))) are not telling us the full truth.
Ey man, I have a job due to endless pursuits to leave this sphere. It’s about the journey, not the destination.
I have had 5 rampant Nasaist's read wagging the moondoggle (free online) and all come away shaking their heads looking sheepish and saying 'how could i be so fucking dumb'
just saw this thread/thought you might find it interesting.
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message5016783/pg1