There are legitimate reasons. Nothing really there in terms of resources, so cost effectiveness isn't there.
You would expect some colonization but apparently not. Weirdly enough, what gets me isn't that we don't send people there right now, but that we haven't sent more remote probes and such up there. It would be expensive, yes, but due to proximity we could use better equipment and physically return if we had to, not to mention better real time commands. Really weird and something I hadn't thought of until now.
I am not someone who doubts the moon landing, but I have seen some things that makes me question if things have really gone exactly as we were told
The moon was so important that we haven't bothered to go back in a half century.
There are legitimate reasons. Nothing really there in terms of resources, so cost effectiveness isn't there.
You would expect some colonization but apparently not. Weirdly enough, what gets me isn't that we don't send people there right now, but that we haven't sent more remote probes and such up there. It would be expensive, yes, but due to proximity we could use better equipment and physically return if we had to, not to mention better real time commands. Really weird and something I hadn't thought of until now.
I am not someone who doubts the moon landing, but I have seen some things that makes me question if things have really gone exactly as we were told
The Japanese and Russian have both sent rovers I believe.
Well fuck our government then