Everyone is entitled to their own opinion regarding who to follow vs. who to chalk up as a LARP, but there’s a significant contingent of the GAW community who, after doing our own research over the past FULL YEAR since GN started having chats, have determined they are at the very least a reasonable source of encouragement and look forward to the compilations from u/FBLie and u/EchoLight very much. If GN is more than that (as many of us still believe they are), time will eventually bear that out and demonstrate exactly what their role actually is—whatever it is. If they’re not, that will also eventually become evident through facts much more solid than what’s been presented up to now. This has all been debated extensively and repeatedly—the reasoning behind both possible conclusions—and it is likely counterproductive to rehash it all again if such divisive drama within the community can be avoided.
There has never been sufficient evidence presented against GeorgeNews to justify banning posts/discussion related to them. There is nothing objectionable in their content (never anti-Trump, anti-Q, advocating violence, or whatever—and they NEVER doom!), and the volume of posts about them is already minimal: it’s not like anyone’s overwhelming the board with them. If you don’t want to read the occasional GN-related post, then just scroll on. Banning/removing the content is a bridge too far.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion regarding who to follow vs. who to chalk up as a LARP, but there’s a significant contingent of the GAW community who, after doing our own research over the past FULL YEAR since GN started having chats, have determined they are at the very least a reasonable source of encouragement and look forward to the compilations from u/FBLie and u/EchoLight very much. If GN is more than that (as many of us still believe they are), time will eventually bear that out and demonstrate exactly what their role actually is—whatever it is. If they’re not, that will also eventually become evident through facts much more solid than what’s been presented up to now. This has all been debated extensively and repeatedly—the reasoning behind both possible conclusions—and it is likely counterproductive to rehash it all again if such divisive drama within the community can be avoided.
There has never been sufficient evidence presented against GeorgeNews to justify banning posts/discussion related to them. There is nothing objectionable in their content (never anti-Trump, anti-Q, advocating violence, or whatever—and they NEVER doom!), and the volume of posts about them is already minimal: it’s not like anyone’s overwhelming the board with them. If you don’t want to read the occasional GN-related post, then just scroll on. Banning/removing the content is a bridge too far.