I'm not personally interested in the stats/analytics side of Frank, Piton, Shiva, or Keshel as it's a "canary in the coalmine"/red flag type situation, but gets too into the weeds for me, I like things that I can show to people and explain without them going "Huh?".

I like Pulitzer from the standpoint of he's explaining how things work and how he's going to prove it. That being said, here we are almost a year later and he's just wanting to release volumes of shit to sell (which I don't think it will, and I hope it doesn't really), uses legal as a reason as to why he can't go into more depth after saying he's going to go into more depth. Shiva raised some very important questions when Shiva attacked Pulitzer on ConservativeDaily and I'm glad Pulitzer addressed them the following day on Pulitzer's platform. I really didn't like Pulitzer attacking Oltmann as Oltmann was just trying to be an arbitrator and Pulitzer did act childish in my eyes about the whole Clements vs Pulitzer debate. So I definitely understand the criticism against him and also don't believe he's pure but he also states why he's not pure. I think he's devious and intentionally not forthright about the details of facts to lure people into traps, but feel that's needed for the shitstorm, provides just enough rope for people to hang themselves. IE being deceptive about what he was looking for about vote secure paper so that Shiva attacked him on a particular detail so he could counter while still not reveal what he's actually looking for to prove vote secure wasn't used. ​

My personal favorites:

For betting on winning in lawsuits/overturn:

Pulitzer is my lead horse in the race, it starts with the paper and our elections need to end with the paper. Explains how things will be brought to light, has active involvement in developing the technology and procedures for the audits that will make or break the election overturn.

Oltmann for his Dominion/Coomer exposure. In the "feels" department he's the one I would consider to being most genuine. If we're going to take down Dominion, he's my lead horse in that race.

Sidney Powell probably my third and the only lawyer I'd bet on out of the bunch. I don't actively listen to what she's up to but know she's still working on things and still surprises me every month or two. I always have different podcasts playing in the background and her voice has a certain shrill to it that just drives me crazy and sadly that's the only reason I don't follow her more.

For cheering:

Lindell, even though I question the data he has and where he got it from (which I truly hope it ends up being Space Force or military whistleblower or the like). Appreciate that he's in front constantly attacking the media and Dominion, invests in setting up his own platform, puts his money where his mouth is and it's a big mouth!

Lin Wood, gets a little bit too over the top religiously for me, but he seems to have no problem stirring the shit. I think we need to challenge ourselves so while I view character attacks as a turnoff I appreciate someone that is willing to challenge our own side's opinion.

Clements, he's second in my feels department, I spent many nights on his late night podcasts early 2021. Saw him grow from a nobody in the sphere with like 100 viewers a night just shooting the shit back and forth in the middle of the night and had back and forths on his youtube streams before he got canned.