You have to understand that AP especially is part of a system. "Ownership" is irrelevant. It is similar to the Federal Reserve. Ownership does not matter.
The only thing that matters is who CONTROLS it.
The Federal Reserve banks are "owned" by member banks. But they have no power -- and that is the point. The power is what matters, not the ownership.
In the Federal Reserve, the ONLY power position is the president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, because that is who controls the manipulation of the money supply -- which is the ONLY reason that the FR exists (to make profits off manipulating the money supply).
The position of president has the power, but WHO CONTROLS THE PRESIDENT of the NY FR? THAT is the important question.
At this point, you get into PRIVATE CONTRACTS, such as voting trusts and other types of contracts that are NOT available to the public.
THOSE people who have those agreements are the ones who REALLY control the Federal Reserve.
The Associated Press is similar.
Its REAL function is to MANIPULATE the "news" that is broadcast to millions of people.
It is officially a non-profit organization, "owned" you could say by its members. Those members are thousands of "news" outlets.
So, some jackass at the New York Times creates a fictional story out of nothing, citing "anonymous sources" that don't really exist. This article is published in their paper, but their readership is minimal.
So ... they send the article to the Associated Press. At the AP, another jackass decides that this article should be sent out to all members. And those thousands of members then publish the "AP article" which then goes out to millions of people via newspapers, radio, TV, internet, etc.
Who actually CONTROLS which articles go out to the members is the KEY. THEY are the ones with the power.
Even more to the point is WHO CONTROLS THEM? Once again, we get back to private contracts, which are not available to the general public.
This is how the cabal keeps power behind the scenes, making it look like it is all open to the public, when in fact it is not.
Reuters is owned by Thomson Reuters. But who CONTROLS (not owns) Thomson Reuters? That is the key. And the answer is: YOU are not allowed to know THAT.
Your question is a third-grader's question that has a PhD-level answer.
The people who control things in secret are not stupid enough to make it obvious to the public.
You have to understand that AP especially is part of a system. "Ownership" is irrelevant. It is similar to the Federal Reserve. Ownership does not matter.
The only thing that matters is who CONTROLS it.
The Federal Reserve banks are "owned" by member banks. But they have no power -- and that is the point. The power is what matters, not the ownership.
In the Federal Reserve, the ONLY power position is the president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, because that is who controls the manipulation of the money supply -- which is the ONLY reason that the FR exists (to make profits off manipulating the money supply).
The position of president has the power, but WHO CONTROLS THE PRESIDENT of the NY FR? THAT is the important question.
At this point, you get into PRIVATE CONTRACTS, such as voting trusts and other types of contracts that are NOT available to the public.
THOSE people who have those agreements are the ones who REALLY control the Federal Reserve.
The Associated Press is similar.
Its REAL function is to MANIPULATE the "news" that is broadcast to millions of people.
It is officially a non-profit organization, "owned" you could say by its members. Those members are thousands of "news" outlets.
So, some jackass at the New York Times creates a fictional story out of nothing, citing "anonymous sources" that don't really exist. This article is published in their paper, but their readership is minimal.
So ... they send the article to the Associated Press. At the AP, another jackass decides that this article should be sent out to all members. And those thousands of members then publish the "AP article" which then goes out to millions of people via newspapers, radio, TV, internet, etc.
Who actually CONTROLS which articles go out to the members is the KEY. THEY are the ones with the power.
Even more to the point is WHO CONTROLS THEM? Once again, we get back to private contracts, which are not available to the general public.
This is how the cabal keeps power behind the scenes, making it look like it is all open to the public, when in fact it is not.
Reuters is owned by Thomson Reuters. But who CONTROLS (not owns) Thomson Reuters? That is the key. And the answer is: YOU are not allowed to know THAT.
Your question is a third-grader's question that has a PhD-level answer.
The people who control things in secret are not stupid enough to make it obvious to the public.