I posted my theory on a different thread, and it doesn't surprise me at all.
My assumption is Starbucks was in danger of losing more employees, because less people are willing to take the jab just to keep a low paying job. In addition, those employees would be able to find a replacement job and possibly sue Starbucks and recoup back pay plus damages.
Meanwhile, Carhartt probably has a high vaccine uptake already (90% or higher) and can afford to fire people.
Starbucks is definitely in trouble given how I keep hearing complaining about locations all having reduced hours now due to labor shortage. However will their customers now freak that they might have a filthy unjabbed barrista?
I posted my theory on a different thread, and it doesn't surprise me at all.
My assumption is Starbucks was in danger of losing more employees, because less people are willing to take the jab just to keep a low paying job. In addition, those employees would be able to find a replacement job and possibly sue Starbucks and recoup back pay plus damages.
Meanwhile, Carhartt probably has a high vaccine uptake already (90% or higher) and can afford to fire people.
Starbucks is definitely in trouble given how I keep hearing complaining about locations all having reduced hours now due to labor shortage. However will their customers now freak that they might have a filthy unjabbed barrista?