Only delta for the 20th.
(qposts.online)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Eisenhower is the guy who allowed the military industrial complex to take root. I am not sure whether this is a warning or he is just taking credit from the Cabal. His later life should shed some light on this (too lazy to dig into this)
No Eisenhower warned about the potential military industrial complex in his farewell address. He was my first president, they killed my second president JFK.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. - Farewell Address, Jan. 17, 1961
I am not the one to burst anybody's bubbles, but remember, many of the people we look up highly may turn out to be different from what we thought they were.
It was indeed this video that Q posted. It's worth listening the whole way. This is by no means a warning video. At best it's like a cigarette pack that says "Smoking is harmful to health".
Even though they do the bidding of the Cabal, they never consider themselves to be the servants of the Cabal. They believe they are serving some higher purpose.
We are not the only ones manipulated, even many of the leaders are manipulated the same way. Its possible just like Woodrow Wilson had qualms about allowing Federal Reserve, Eisenhower had some qualms about what he had created. There is a bigger rabbit hole into Eisenhower, its been a long time since I dug into that.
Idk. Q said we only see 20% of the show, I’m assuming that applies to history as well. I’m assuming that what we do know(both true and fake) is only 20% of the actual historical info we need to know.
Ike thought they killed patton and was worried about us infiltration
Absolutely. You can dig up another 20-40% just by going through history with a different lense and another 10-20% if you can understand symbolism.
Thanks for posting this....Eisenhower was a WW President and Trump is a WW President...mirror
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
So I'm guessing the address given on the 17th of the month has no symbolism here??