This company makes clothes almost exclusively for people who take risks for a living, Construction, linemen, agriculture, DOT,
The kind of people who are out in the blizzard you can’t drive in to keep the lights on in your factory. Cowards.
I’ll never buy one of their products again.
Too bad. It is good stuff.
What’s a good alternative?
Keep posting Carhartt's customer link. More people need to have this grow within them very quickly. These companies may be coerced by their financial banking institution. We can do the same by boycotting. Who has more power?
“Carhartt fully understands and respects the varying opinions on this topic, and we are aware some of our associates do not support this policy. However, we stand behind our decision because we believe vaccines are necessary to protect our workforce.”
The degree to which you are betraying your target demographic cannot be over-stated.
The people who grow your food, maintain your roads, and keep your lights on take extreme risk every-day.
Your unwillingness to accept a tiny risk, in the face of a growing, totalitarian, medical tyranny will not soon be forgotten.
I will not purchase another Carhartt product until you reverse this asinine decision to enforce a wholly unconstitutional and immoral requirement that your employees inject themselves with a gene therapeutic completely devoid of liability protection and long-term safety data.
The following is for information purposes only and is not to be interpreted in any other manner, including legal advice.
I will not purchase any of more of your product henceforth for the following reason.
In my opinion, Carhartt has no right to make law (policy) in the absence of law, especially when it violates religious and personal health beliefs. It is clearly an overreach and tyrannical in character. Demanding that someone be vaccinated with a drug classified by the FDA as 'experimental' (Doe et al. v. Austin) under EAU classification may be the unlicensed practice of medicine. Carhartt, Inc. and management are inferred as not medical practitioners and insured as such. Henceforth, Carhardt, Inc. may be held liable.
MN Statutes §147.081. Practicing Without License
“It is unlawful for any person to practice medicine by offering or undertaking to prevent or to diagnose, correct, or treat in any manner or by any means, methods, devices, or instrumentalities, any disease, illness, pain, wound, fracture, infirmity, deformity or defect of any person;”
To intimidate an employee to get injected by the threat of firing may be also be liable for 'coercion'. This may also be unlawful and a crime.
18 US Code §241. Conspiracy against rights
"If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; ...
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death."
After the recent Supreme Court ruling against OSHA many legal experts are now saying the lawsuits are going to come. An employment lawyer who works at one of the largest employment lawyer firms has echoed the same words. He said it will take time, but there's a new tobacco industry class action lawsuits on the horizon.
Starbucks recently nixed their vaccine mandate, Carhartt would be wise to do the same.
I received this message from a thread that has gone viral. I intend to not purchase Carhartt products from now on.
Carhartt, the popular United States manufacturer of durable work gear, sent an e-mail to its 5,500 workers notifying them that they had to receive the COVID-19 vaccine by February 15 in order to continue working for the company.
In a statement provided to The Washington Post, a spokesperson for the company defended the decision, again reiterating they would be firing unvaccinated employees in the name of COVID-19 safety:
Carhartt spokeswoman Amy Hellebuyck confirmed to The Washington Post on Tuesday that Valade sent the internal email to employees “as part of our long-standing commitment to workplace safety.”
“Our recent communication to employees was to reinforce that the Supreme Court ruling does not affect the mandate we put in place,” she said in a statement. “Carhartt fully understands and respects the varying opinions on this topic, and we are aware some of our associates do not support this policy. However, we stand behind our decision because we believe vaccines are necessary to protect our workforce.”
I agree. All indications is that the driver of this insanity are the banks. I suspected the lending institutions were behind the push to "vaxxinate" because there is no EO for the private sector mandating corporations of 100+ employees be vaccinated. There was an EO for Federal workers and contractors and another directing OSHA to write guidelines. None of these EOs affected the private sector at the time. OSHA had not published their guidelines and yet oddly large corporations were mandating the 'COVID' vaxxine. It made no sense. So, who was coercing the large corporations to act without government authority? I suspected it had to be the lending institutions. Then, the IMF confirmed my suspicion when they refused to grant a loan to government of Belarus. The reason was they did not have a plan to mandate 'vaxxination' of their population. Who the hell do these people think they are?
We must act against the lending institutions. They need to receive subpoenas for all communications of them driving this.
Under the EAU and on-going P[L]andemic, the United States has become medically the equivalent of the 'COVID' wild west'. There is no law for the requirement of vaxxination for working adults. There is no law permitting corporations to mandate such a policy. Unfortunately because of the EAU and P[L]andemic, there is no law preventing corporations from enacting these mandates though. Again, it is the 'COVID' wild west. New laws need to be enacted in every State that would essentially act as a new Magna Carta protecting the natural Right of each individual's natural immunity and recognizing this natural Right being ordained from the Creator Himself and not by government or persons, or legal fictions, and is not to be ever infringed.
Corporations have no right to make law (policy) in the absence of law, especially when it violates religious and personal health beliefs. It is clearly an overreach and tyrannical in character. Demanding that someone wear be vaxxinated is the unlicensed practice of medicine. Corporation in general, are not medical practitioners and are not insured as such. They are liable..
Thanks, This sort of thing needs to grow in people very quickly. @Herringbone sent me a link to Carhartt customer service. Check out my reply to @Herringbone.
This company makes clothes almost exclusively for people who take risks for a living, Construction, linemen, agriculture, DOT, The kind of people who are out in the blizzard you can’t drive in to keep the lights on in your factory. Cowards. I’ll never buy one of their products again. Too bad. It is good stuff. What’s a good alternative?
Keep posting Carhartt's customer link. More people need to have this grow within them very quickly. These companies may be coerced by their financial banking institution. We can do the same by boycotting. Who has more power?
The carhart stores in malls are half full of junk for old suburban guys
I just submitted the following to their feedback website. Please consider doing the same:
https://www.carhartt.com/contact-us
A quote from your spokesperson Amy Hellebuyck.
“Carhartt fully understands and respects the varying opinions on this topic, and we are aware some of our associates do not support this policy. However, we stand behind our decision because we believe vaccines are necessary to protect our workforce.”
The degree to which you are betraying your target demographic cannot be over-stated.
The people who grow your food, maintain your roads, and keep your lights on take extreme risk every-day.
Your unwillingness to accept a tiny risk, in the face of a growing, totalitarian, medical tyranny will not soon be forgotten.
I will not purchase another Carhartt product until you reverse this asinine decision to enforce a wholly unconstitutional and immoral requirement that your employees inject themselves with a gene therapeutic completely devoid of liability protection and long-term safety data.
Thanks, I did the same. Here is what I wrote.
The following is for information purposes only and is not to be interpreted in any other manner, including legal advice.
I will not purchase any of more of your product henceforth for the following reason.
In my opinion, Carhartt has no right to make law (policy) in the absence of law, especially when it violates religious and personal health beliefs. It is clearly an overreach and tyrannical in character. Demanding that someone be vaccinated with a drug classified by the FDA as 'experimental' (Doe et al. v. Austin) under EAU classification may be the unlicensed practice of medicine. Carhartt, Inc. and management are inferred as not medical practitioners and insured as such. Henceforth, Carhardt, Inc. may be held liable.
MN Statutes §147.081. Practicing Without License
“It is unlawful for any person to practice medicine by offering or undertaking to prevent or to diagnose, correct, or treat in any manner or by any means, methods, devices, or instrumentalities, any disease, illness, pain, wound, fracture, infirmity, deformity or defect of any person;”
To intimidate an employee to get injected by the threat of firing may be also be liable for 'coercion'. This may also be unlawful and a crime.
18 US Code §241. Conspiracy against rights
"If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; ...
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death."
After the recent Supreme Court ruling against OSHA many legal experts are now saying the lawsuits are going to come. An employment lawyer who works at one of the largest employment lawyer firms has echoed the same words. He said it will take time, but there's a new tobacco industry class action lawsuits on the horizon.
Starbucks recently nixed their vaccine mandate, Carhartt would be wise to do the same.
I received this message from a thread that has gone viral. I intend to not purchase Carhartt products from now on.
Plagiarize away fren. And navigate and disseminate nimbly.
Carhartt, the popular United States manufacturer of durable work gear, sent an e-mail to its 5,500 workers notifying them that they had to receive the COVID-19 vaccine by February 15 in order to continue working for the company.
In a statement provided to The Washington Post, a spokesperson for the company defended the decision, again reiterating they would be firing unvaccinated employees in the name of COVID-19 safety:
Carhartt spokeswoman Amy Hellebuyck confirmed to The Washington Post on Tuesday that Valade sent the internal email to employees “as part of our long-standing commitment to workplace safety.”
Buying goods manufactured entirely by a workforce with brain fog is a risk I'm unwilling to take.
Tell Carhartt's customer service. @Herringbone above has provided a link. Read my complaint there I made at Carhartt. Never forget. Never forgive.
Most of there stuff is Mexican or slave labor now so you already have
I emailed them to tell them exactly why I won't be a customer any longer
Good on you. More people need have this activism to grow within them and to do it quickly.
Woke leadership.
Go back on your meds
I agree. All indications is that the driver of this insanity are the banks. I suspected the lending institutions were behind the push to "vaxxinate" because there is no EO for the private sector mandating corporations of 100+ employees be vaccinated. There was an EO for Federal workers and contractors and another directing OSHA to write guidelines. None of these EOs affected the private sector at the time. OSHA had not published their guidelines and yet oddly large corporations were mandating the 'COVID' vaxxine. It made no sense. So, who was coercing the large corporations to act without government authority? I suspected it had to be the lending institutions. Then, the IMF confirmed my suspicion when they refused to grant a loan to government of Belarus. The reason was they did not have a plan to mandate 'vaxxination' of their population. Who the hell do these people think they are?
We must act against the lending institutions. They need to receive subpoenas for all communications of them driving this.
Under the EAU and on-going P[L]andemic, the United States has become medically the equivalent of the 'COVID' wild west'. There is no law for the requirement of vaxxination for working adults. There is no law permitting corporations to mandate such a policy. Unfortunately because of the EAU and P[L]andemic, there is no law preventing corporations from enacting these mandates though. Again, it is the 'COVID' wild west. New laws need to be enacted in every State that would essentially act as a new Magna Carta protecting the natural Right of each individual's natural immunity and recognizing this natural Right being ordained from the Creator Himself and not by government or persons, or legal fictions, and is not to be ever infringed.
Corporations have no right to make law (policy) in the absence of law, especially when it violates religious and personal health beliefs. It is clearly an overreach and tyrannical in character. Demanding that someone wear be vaxxinated is the unlicensed practice of medicine. Corporation in general, are not medical practitioners and are not insured as such. They are liable..
Awesome. My competitor is a cuck.
Thanks, This sort of thing needs to grow in people very quickly. @Herringbone sent me a link to Carhartt customer service. Check out my reply to @Herringbone.