2
Revrant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Take it for what it is, but I've run across folks having success with the carnivore diet here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzDpVINQv24

Worth a shot?

1
Revrant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there a constitutional basis for this? AFAIK, all powers not explicitly given to the federal government in the constitution are reserved to the states and the people.

So was there something that gave the fed the power to come into a sovereign state to do this kind of thing, or are the NWO SCOTUS members just statists saying the fed can do what they want?

18
Revrant 18 points ago +24 / -6

The mods and people attacking and disparaging it are the ones who keep bringing it up.

If this is a q board about q and we are supposed to stay on topic about q why do the mods keep talking about FE and sticking posts about it?

It's almost like they want to talk about and cause fights because they are bored.

5
Revrant 5 points ago +5 / -0

The irony is that even if it is a sphere, most of the comments are very ignorant to even the basics of the concept. Basically sound about on the same level of someone coming in here to claim Q is a LARP.

9
Revrant 9 points ago +9 / -0

He was almost certainly the most tyrannical US president of all time

1
Revrant 1 point ago +2 / -1

I wouldn't not vote for it

1
Revrant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice! I just realized I was subscribed to them but haven't seen a video come up in ages. Did they get banned from YouTube?

1
Revrant 1 point ago +1 / -0

“All things were made through it.” The logos is an “it,” not a “him.” God made everything through and according to His logos, His plan and purpose, and with wisdom. The logos was God’s plan and purpose, especially as it was put into action. Furthermore, it was integrally tied together with His wisdom.

1
Revrant 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a great way to describe how the Roman catholic church invented the Trinity, a concept not found in scripture, and exactly how these verses are used.

https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx28QyjySUg8EPpSNCnJ_Tk5kK6tcmte6c

-1
Revrant -1 points ago +5 / -6

No, not really. When do you want to side with the almost bumblingly wrong religious leaders of the time?

Keep reading, he identifies himself as the son of God.

This would have been a great place for him to reveal his god-hood if it were true.

https://www.biblicalunitarian.com/verses/john-10-33

1
Revrant 1 point ago +2 / -1

A good one for this is John 17:3 (I think). Here he declares God the father as "the one true God" and also differentiates himself. So according to Jesus' own words, the father is "the one true God" and he is someone else, sent by God, the trinity can't be the one true God whom the father and Jesus both belong to

1
Revrant 1 point ago +2 / -1

Unbiblical assumptions

2
Revrant 2 points ago +3 / -1

Who says you're going to heaven? Seems like you're resurrected to a new body and there's a new earth and the new Jerusalem comes down, and Jesus comes down and God comes down to dwell on the new earth. So, no one... because you're not going to heaven

3
Revrant 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's not what this verse means. It doesn't say "I and the father are God". "I and the father are one" refers to purpose and agency. If taken at an absolute literal level of jesus = the father, it would be silly

by jb12458
1
Revrant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good job escaping the matrix

view more: Next ›