What other type of bs things have they done or gone along with? cancer? other deadly diseases?
Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses. They find new ones each year.
The CDC has covered up the Lyme epidemic for decades.
Infectious disease doctors and neurologists routinely gaslight patients and tell them "Lyme is cured by 2 weeks of antibiotics" or "Lyme does not exist here."
The ELISA test for Lyme is inaccurate 50% of the time. You can test "negative" on it and still have Lyme.
Lyme suppresses the immune system, drills into bone and tissue, hides in biofilms and cyst form.
Lyme is everywhere, ticks are everywhere, they are carried by migrating birds. Does your city have mice, feral cats, coyotes, or raccoons? It has ticks.
I hear you. My question was partly rhetorical. I know they pull this bs in many other areas of medicine. We have a "health care" system that's policy- and protocol-driven rather than preventative and treatment. But policy-driven health care is much more lucrative for all except the patient.
Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses. They find new ones each year.
The CDC has covered up the Lyme epidemic for decades.
Infectious disease doctors and neurologists routinely gaslight patients and tell them "Lyme is cured by 2 weeks of antibiotics" or "Lyme does not exist here."
The ELISA test for Lyme is inaccurate 50% of the time. You can test "negative" on it and still have Lyme.
Lyme suppresses the immune system, drills into bone and tissue, hides in biofilms and cyst form.
Lyme is everywhere, ticks are everywhere, they are carried by migrating birds. Does your city have mice, feral cats, coyotes, or raccoons? It has ticks.
I hear you. My question was partly rhetorical. I know they pull this bs in many other areas of medicine. We have a "health care" system that's policy- and protocol-driven rather than preventative and treatment. But policy-driven health care is much more lucrative for all except the patient.