DEVOLUTION KICKOFF DAY MAGATHREAD- MILITARY PEPEs and all others, comment what you can safely share based on what you observe.
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
I haven't even read devolution but hubby has- I hope today really is the day. Kick off is at noon! Update: OR, tomorrow because Devolution says 1 year and 1 day....... so 24 hour maga thread!
Well but that’s exactly what I’m saying. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with speculating on dates either, because I in fact I think things will happen this year and pretty soon, because we’ve already passed one year of being occupied by a foreign power. I think devolution is real and I think things are going to get very nasty very soon for the deep state.
So when I make a hypothetical, and say “what if nothing major happens in the next two years, five years, 10 years, 20 years, I think by that point? If nothing has happened? People will drop out. People start to realize we’ve been full. Because I don’t think it will take that long. But if it does, something went wrong, or we were never told the truth in the first place.
Again, it’s a hypothetical, it’s a thought exercise. I do think things will happen and it will happen soon. But let’s say they don’t. By any measure. But your Measure, my Measure or anybody’s Measure. What happens if that stays that way for five years, seven years, nine years, 10 years. Will it have been that we were lied to? I think so. Don’t you?
Again, I’m not saying that’s going to happen. I think it’s gonna happen this year. And I have no problem saying that. I’m not afraid of “date fagging” because I think by this point, the date, has be coming soon.
That’s not what I’m saying at all. Don’t be so defensive. It makes it look like you don’t really believe what you’re defending. You should be able to take some interesting or tough questions. Like when I defend my Christian faith against atheists, I’m able to take tough questions, tough ones, really tough ones, ones that make me uncomfortable.
For the record, if nothing major happens in 20 years, or 40 years, or 50 years, you wouldn’t be able to say that you (and I- a devolution believer) were wrong about Q? Really?
Again, all I was laying out was a hypothetical. And in that hypothetical I asked the question. If it takes 20 years or five years or 10 years or 40 years, and absolutely nothing happened, no major arrests happened. Not podesta, not Hillary Clinton, not Biden, not the satanic fucks, not the cunts in the FBI or the CIA, if none of that ever happens… And the things that people have said have “happened” aren’t major to me. They are significant but they aren’t major. They aren’t the big top of the pile guys. They just aren’t. We haven’t pinched any of the major major major major major players.
If none of those people are popped in the next five years, 10 years, 20 years, podesta, Clinton, Obama, Biden, call me, so on and so forth, you would still believe? I don’t believe you.
After 20 years? 30? 50?
Anyone who puts forth that there are no circumstances under which they could be proven wrong tells me they are suckers for their confirmation bias.
Again, I say this as someone who is date fagging. I actually think justice is coming soon and I think the evidence points to that, I think the evidence points to devolution. I think Durham, who was the final message, the most important message, the most direct message, is doing his job behind the scenes. I believe more than you think I do, I suspect.
But I have deep and serious questions about anyone who thinks it would be perfectly fine if absolutely nothing major happens against the major players in the next five years, 10 years, 20 years, etc.
You know who the major players are, don’t pretend you don’t. If none of them are punished in the next five years, 10 years, 20 years, you don’t think you would question your beliefs? Because I would. And if you say that you wouldn’t?
I don’t believe you.
Of course Q is real. I’m not a fucking retard.
And no, I’m not attacking, if you think I am, you missed the entire point of my hypothetical scenario. That’s not on me, that’s on you.
Again, you’re very very defensive, which speaks more about you than it does about me and a hypothetical scenario I’m positing which I don’t even necessarily believe, but I’m asking for the point of conversation.
Did you miss that important point the first few times? Review what I - as a devolution advocate- said repeatedly.
The idea that you think I am anti-Q because of what I am asking or saying is extremely reflective upon you, not me. You are overly defensive against innocent queries, questions, and hypotheticals.
The idea that you assume I am anti-Q is hilarious. That’s really what you think? I don’t even know what to tell you at this point. You are being oversensitive to someone who has questions, and is presenting hypothetical situations that may or may not be real or true and admitted as much when he originally made them. Don’t be so sensitive, dude.
We are on the same side but you’re making me out to be an enemy because you choose to. That’s on you. Not on me. I love you. You’re a patriot, you are a good person, but you are making me out to be a villain when I am not that.