Table 16: Age Standardised Mortality Rate per 100,000 with 95% confidence intervals
you can clearly see the weekly death rates of those with 2 doses are higher than the unvaccinated. While booster shots have a low standardised mortality rate, many more people died along the way to getting their 3rd dose. The vaccine will kill anyone who just isn't strong/lucky enough to handle the initial 2 doses.
pg 51
"In Scotland, from the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccination programme over 3 million individuals have received a booster or 3rd dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Of these, 96 individuals (0.003%) tested positive by PCR for SARS-CoV-2 more than fourteen days after receiving their booster or third dose of COVID-19 vaccine and subsequently died with COVID-19 recorded as underlying or contributory cause of death. The majority of these individuals (99.0%) had several comorbidities which contributed to their deaths and the mean age was 78 years old (IQR 72 to 90 years old)"
They are only counting people that got Covid and died 14 days after receiving their booster/3rd dose of vaccine. What an evil way to manipulate the data. Sounds like a certain agency I know that starts with the letters C-D-C
pg 63
COVID-19 vaccination status is defined as per the following:
• Unvaccinated: An individual that has had no doses of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR or has had one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive less than or equal to 21 days after their 1st dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Dose 1: An individual that has had one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 21 days after their 1st dose of COVID-19 vaccine or less than or equal to 14 days after their second dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Dose 2: An individual that has had at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 14 days after their 2nd dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Booster or 3 doses: An individual that has had a booster or 3rd dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 14 days after their booster or 3rd dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
Yes and the potency data is showing that these vaccines are less safe than if people didn't get a vaccine, regardless of what they discuss about it.
The booster death rate may be lower than the unvaccinated but you had to get a 1st dose and 2nd dose before getting a booster and those are showing higher death rates than if you just stayed unvaccinated.
Per Table 16: The death rate was higher for people with 1 dose or 2 doses of the vaccine than for the unvaccinated. The only people left taking the booster are the ones who survived that filter. Also you aren't considered to have the booster/be vaccinated until 14 days after your booster shot. It says so on Page 63.
COVID-19 vaccination status is defined as per the following:
• Unvaccinated: An individual that has had no doses of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR or has had one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive less than or equal to 21 days after their 1st dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Dose 1: An individual that has had one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 21 days after their 1st dose of COVID-19 vaccine or less than or equal to 14 days after their second dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Dose 2: An individual that has had at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 14 days after their 2nd dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Booster or 3 doses: An individual that has had a booster or 3rd dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 14 days after their booster or 3rd dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
It doesn't fit their narrative. If they didn't like what the data says, they should state what the unaccounted biases and risk factors are. The data doesn't lie but politicians and statisticians will bend the narrative the way they want it to. If the report showed that the 1st and 2nd dosed subjects weren't associated with higher deaths than unvaccinated, they wouldn't have put that footnote there.
If they didn't want us to consider the data, why did they put it in the report? They could have just excluded it. They could've come up with a bs reason why the data shows people with 1 dose or 2 doses are dying at a higher rate than unvaccinated. But they're not, they just have a crybaby footnote that says "The rates in Table 16 should not be used as a measures of vaccine effectiveness due to unaccounted for biases and risk factors."
What biases and risk factors? Give me the details, that's what the report is for. The data doesn't lie, but the report writers do to fit a narrative. That's not science that's politics. I look at the the data and from that data I can mathematically prove that people with their 1st or 2nd doses are dying at a higher rate than unvaccinated.
The scientific method:
If I get a dose of covid-19 then I will have a higher likelihood of death than the unvaccinated because [the vaccine] is causing people to get sick and die.
Those who make it through the 1st and 2nd dose genocide will be much likelier to survive the covid-19 booster shot.
Source:
https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/11223/22-01-19-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf
Thank you, that archive link won't load on my end.
Something is up with the Archive website right now... I'm having problems on my end as well. Come back to it later, it should be working.
https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/11223/22-01-19-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf
pg 50
Table 16: Age Standardised Mortality Rate per 100,000 with 95% confidence intervals
you can clearly see the weekly death rates of those with 2 doses are higher than the unvaccinated. While booster shots have a low standardised mortality rate, many more people died along the way to getting their 3rd dose. The vaccine will kill anyone who just isn't strong/lucky enough to handle the initial 2 doses.
pg 51
"In Scotland, from the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccination programme over 3 million individuals have received a booster or 3rd dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Of these, 96 individuals (0.003%) tested positive by PCR for SARS-CoV-2 more than fourteen days after receiving their booster or third dose of COVID-19 vaccine and subsequently died with COVID-19 recorded as underlying or contributory cause of death. The majority of these individuals (99.0%) had several comorbidities which contributed to their deaths and the mean age was 78 years old (IQR 72 to 90 years old)"
They are only counting people that got Covid and died 14 days after receiving their booster/3rd dose of vaccine. What an evil way to manipulate the data. Sounds like a certain agency I know that starts with the letters C-D-C
pg 63
COVID-19 vaccination status is defined as per the following:
• Unvaccinated: An individual that has had no doses of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR or has had one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive less than or equal to 21 days after their 1st dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Dose 1: An individual that has had one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 21 days after their 1st dose of COVID-19 vaccine or less than or equal to 14 days after their second dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Dose 2: An individual that has had at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 14 days after their 2nd dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Booster or 3 doses: An individual that has had a booster or 3rd dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 14 days after their booster or 3rd dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
A BIG part of their experiment is accumulating potency data.
Yes and the potency data is showing that these vaccines are less safe than if people didn't get a vaccine, regardless of what they discuss about it.
The booster death rate may be lower than the unvaccinated but you had to get a 1st dose and 2nd dose before getting a booster and those are showing higher death rates than if you just stayed unvaccinated.
Yeah pg 50 and 51 as well as 63
https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/11223/22-01-19-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf
Per Table 16: The death rate was higher for people with 1 dose or 2 doses of the vaccine than for the unvaccinated. The only people left taking the booster are the ones who survived that filter. Also you aren't considered to have the booster/be vaccinated until 14 days after your booster shot. It says so on Page 63. COVID-19 vaccination status is defined as per the following:
• Unvaccinated: An individual that has had no doses of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR or has had one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive less than or equal to 21 days after their 1st dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Dose 1: An individual that has had one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 21 days after their 1st dose of COVID-19 vaccine or less than or equal to 14 days after their second dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Dose 2: An individual that has had at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 14 days after their 2nd dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
• Booster or 3 doses: An individual that has had a booster or 3rd dose of COVID-19 vaccine and has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR more than 14 days after their booster or 3rd dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
It doesn't fit their narrative. If they didn't like what the data says, they should state what the unaccounted biases and risk factors are. The data doesn't lie but politicians and statisticians will bend the narrative the way they want it to. If the report showed that the 1st and 2nd dosed subjects weren't associated with higher deaths than unvaccinated, they wouldn't have put that footnote there.
If they didn't want us to consider the data, why did they put it in the report? They could have just excluded it. They could've come up with a bs reason why the data shows people with 1 dose or 2 doses are dying at a higher rate than unvaccinated. But they're not, they just have a crybaby footnote that says "The rates in Table 16 should not be used as a measures of vaccine effectiveness due to unaccounted for biases and risk factors."
What biases and risk factors? Give me the details, that's what the report is for. The data doesn't lie, but the report writers do to fit a narrative. That's not science that's politics. I look at the the data and from that data I can mathematically prove that people with their 1st or 2nd doses are dying at a higher rate than unvaccinated.
The scientific method:
If I get a dose of covid-19 then I will have a higher likelihood of death than the unvaccinated because [the vaccine] is causing people to get sick and die.
Those who make it through the 1st and 2nd dose genocide will be much likelier to survive the covid-19 booster shot.